From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57286 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751765AbdDRONS (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:13:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:13:12 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Simon Horman , Mark Rutland , panand@redhat.com, Ard Biesheuvel , Geoff Levand , Dave Young , Will Deacon , Linux-Renesas , AKASHI Takahiro , James Morse , Mark Salter , bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sgoel@codeaurora.org, David Woodhouse , "kexec@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , arm@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Fix power-of-ten vs. power-of-two prefixes in comments etc. Message-ID: <20170418141312.GD27592@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20170328065130.16019-2-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <1491207492.6020.8.camel@infradead.org> <20170404054144.GG16309@linaro.org> <20170404073504.GI16309@linaro.org> <1491291844.6218.25.camel@infradead.org> <20170404092604.GB14898@arm.com> <1492085938.20068.6.camel@infradead.org> <20170416231223.GA31693@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:54:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 01:18:58PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> Less important than in user-visible messages, but still good practice as > >> there's still no excuse for ARM64 code to look like it was written before > >> 1996. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse > > > > Hi David, > > > > I'd be happy to take the Renesas portions of this change if they were > > broken out into a separate patch. The reason I would prefer a separate > > patch is to avoid the possibility of conflicts, even trivial ones. > > s/possibility/reality/, unless this series goes in before v4.12-rc1. Maybe the arm-soc guys can take both patches on top of the other series they pull, in which case, for both patches: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:13:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Fix power-of-ten vs. power-of-two prefixes in comments etc. In-Reply-To: References: <20170328065130.16019-2-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <1491207492.6020.8.camel@infradead.org> <20170404054144.GG16309@linaro.org> <20170404073504.GI16309@linaro.org> <1491291844.6218.25.camel@infradead.org> <20170404092604.GB14898@arm.com> <1492085938.20068.6.camel@infradead.org> <20170416231223.GA31693@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20170418141312.GD27592@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:54:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 01:18:58PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> Less important than in user-visible messages, but still good practice as > >> there's still no excuse for ARM64 code to look like it was written before > >> 1996. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse > > > > Hi David, > > > > I'd be happy to take the Renesas portions of this change if they were > > broken out into a separate patch. The reason I would prefer a separate > > patch is to avoid the possibility of conflicts, even trivial ones. > > s/possibility/reality/, unless this series goes in before v4.12-rc1. Maybe the arm-soc guys can take both patches on top of the other series they pull, in which case, for both patches: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:13:12 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Fix power-of-ten vs. power-of-two prefixes in comments etc. Message-ID: <20170418141312.GD27592@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20170328065130.16019-2-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <1491207492.6020.8.camel@infradead.org> <20170404054144.GG16309@linaro.org> <20170404073504.GI16309@linaro.org> <1491291844.6218.25.camel@infradead.org> <20170404092604.GB14898@arm.com> <1492085938.20068.6.camel@infradead.org> <20170416231223.GA31693@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Mark Rutland , panand@redhat.com, arm@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Geoff Levand , David Woodhouse , Will Deacon , Linux-Renesas , AKASHI Takahiro , Simon Horman , James Morse , Mark Salter , bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sgoel@codeaurora.org, Dave Young , "kexec@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:54:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 01:18:58PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> Less important than in user-visible messages, but still good practice as > >> there's still no excuse for ARM64 code to look like it was written before > >> 1996. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse > > > > Hi David, > > > > I'd be happy to take the Renesas portions of this change if they were > > broken out into a separate patch. The reason I would prefer a separate > > patch is to avoid the possibility of conflicts, even trivial ones. > > s/possibility/reality/, unless this series goes in before v4.12-rc1. Maybe the arm-soc guys can take both patches on top of the other series they pull, in which case, for both patches: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec