From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0UJK-0000TJ-D3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:41:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0UJJ-0002OH-Ny for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:40:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:40:35 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20170418144035.GI21261@stefanha-x1.localdomain> References: <20170412091819.GB4955@noname.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6lCXDTVICvIQMz0h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] migrate -b problems List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: 858585 jemmy Cc: Kevin Wolf , Fam Zheng , qemu-block@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi --6lCXDTVICvIQMz0h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 05:51:23PM +0800, 858585 jemmy wrote: > it this bug? > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1681688 Yes. This discussion is about the long-term fix instead of a short-term hack for QEMU 2.9. Stefan --6lCXDTVICvIQMz0h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJY9iVjAAoJEJykq7OBq3PI4qwIAJyUreKP9nDIBlyLV6yrFR6j StsrwDJDlJcRW76mEZXpLix3/gu8SO/bhalm+0FDMATwsBnXqW365nV/TPXPklUc bzYSgWfGyOz4QNIT0vuPyXN+1k0+vn3Id5ZEPY8TAmt+nbLhmm3OGmlxpL4Acrqg W7YhhtESvvHUnYZhNfpViHcFOHKCtlGBM9TRaQb/i84HUKjvNK2UAxem1a6niMpc BHp2Oy23PiYekAsJbH0OONBVOFUeXF5lMPz65uSf3kBYW2w0p1+mjef9+NFgurVB 1lXm+Dzbl7KDoK/zOvZs+TuOqA01Kzh/6KEwkGH+skdNQAx7aknDTukPN9t/XuE= =Pahi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6lCXDTVICvIQMz0h--