Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Use discardable buffers for rings

[Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:49:37AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Use discardable buffers for rings
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/23274/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> Series 23274v1 drm/i915: Use discardable buffers for rings
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/23274/revisions/1/mbox/
> 
> Test gem_exec_flush:
>         Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-uc:
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100007
> Test gem_exec_suspend:
>         Subgroup basic-s4-devices:
>                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100125
>                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#100125
> Test kms_cursor_legacy:
>         Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-snb-2600)
> Test pm_rpm:
>         Subgroup basic-rte:
>                 incomplete -> PASS       (fi-bsw-n3050) fdo#100718
> 
> fdo#100007 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100007
> fdo#100125 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100125
> fdo#100718 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100718

Looks scarier than it actually was. Fixed my typos in the commitmsg and
pushed. Thanks for the review, I thought we had been using internal for
rings ever since we added the internal allocator (that was one of the
intended use cases for the allocator).
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx