All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:42:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170421114216.7878bee4@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi Doug,

After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c: In function 'send_connect':
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c:830:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDBG' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     PDBG("%s snd_isn %u\n", __func__, t6req->rsvd);
     ^

Caused by commit

  a9a42886d0b3 ("cxgb4: Convert PDBG to pr_debug")

I have used the rdma tree from next-20170420 for today.

There was another PDBG() missed in that file as well.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

             reply	other threads:[~2017-04-21  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-21  1:42 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2017-04-21  1:58 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree Joe Perches
2017-04-21  2:21   ` Doug Ledford
2017-04-21  2:23     ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21  2:21   ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-26  2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-26  3:04 ` Devesh Sharma
2020-02-26 17:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09  3:30 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09  7:04 ` Mark Zhang
2019-07-09  7:18   ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:43     ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 13:11       ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-10  1:04       ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-10  4:30         ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-16 23:28           ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-17  6:33             ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-07-17  7:45               ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08  3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-08  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09  3:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-25 18:32   ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-07-01  4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01  7:54 ` wangxi
2019-07-01 22:49   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04  2:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-04  2:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04  2:10     ` oulijun
2019-07-04  4:07     ` wangxi
2019-07-04  4:10       ` wangxi
2019-07-04  6:31     ` oulijun
2019-07-05 13:15   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 14:59     ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04  0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04  1:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-04  9:42   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-07  2:41     ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-05 12:25   ` Guy Levi(SW)
2018-12-05 22:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10  0:43       ` Changbin Du
2018-12-10 15:52       ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-01-25  7:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25  8:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-01-25 16:08   ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-31  2:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15  0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15  1:05 ` Doug Ledford
2017-02-15  5:09   ` Selvin Xavier
2016-09-27  1:23 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27  5:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27  5:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 13:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 17:15       ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28  1:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-28 15:00   ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 15:23     ` Greg KH
2016-09-28 15:26       ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 21:45     ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16  6:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-03-16 19:02   ` Doug Ledford
2016-03-16 20:41     ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 22:14     ` Ismail, Mustafa
2016-01-13  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-13  1:35 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170421114216.7878bee4@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.