All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Dipen.Dudhat@freescale.com, richard@nod.at, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	computersforpeace@gmail.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com,
	cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.marshall@omicronenergy.com,
	b44839@freescale.com, prabhakar@freescale.com
Subject: Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC?
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:49:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170421154903.2782cd06@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170421133721.GA15332@amd>

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:37:21 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > (Added driver author to the cc list, maybe he can help).  
> 
> > > > UBIFS complains:
> > > > 
> > > > UBIFS error (pid 931): ubifs_scan: corrupt empty space at LEB 282:252630
> > > > UBIFS error (pid 931): ubifs_scanned_corruption: corruption at LEB 282:252630
> > > > UBIFS error (pid 931): ubifs_scanned_corruption: first 1322 bytes from LEB 282:252630
> > > > UBIFS error (pid 931): ubifs_scan: LEB 282 scanning failed  
> ...
> > > > is_blank() checks for all 0xff's, so single-bit 0xfe in the data will
> > > > result in_blank() == 0 and uncorrectable error being signaled.
> > > > 
> > > > Should the driver be modified somehow?  
> > > 
> > > Yep, nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk() [1] is here to help you check this
> > > case, unfortunately, it's not directly applicable here, because this  
> 
> Maybe I figured it out. Unfortunately, it is only compile tested. Does
> it look approximately right?

Yep that's definitely better. Just one thing missing (see below),
otherwise it looks good.

> 
> Thanks,
> 								Pavel
> 
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c
> @@ -171,32 +171,6 @@ static void set_addr(struct mtd_info *mtd, int column, int page_addr, int oob)
>  		ifc_nand_ctrl->index += mtd->writesize;
>  }
>  
> -static int is_blank(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int bufnum)
> -{
> -	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> -	struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> -	u8 __iomem *addr = priv->vbase + bufnum * (mtd->writesize * 2);
> -	u32 __iomem *mainarea = (u32 __iomem *)addr;
> -	u8 __iomem *oob = addr + mtd->writesize;
> -	struct mtd_oob_region oobregion = { };
> -	int i, section = 0;
> -
> -	i = nand_check_erased_buf(&mainarea[i], mtd->writesize, 0);
> -	if (i)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	mtd_ooblayout_ecc(mtd, section++, &oobregion);
> -	while (oobregion.length) {
> -		i = nand_check_erased_buf(&oob[oobregion.offset], oobregion.length, 0);
> -		if (i)
> -			return 0;
> -
> -		mtd_ooblayout_ecc(mtd, section++, &oobregion);
> -	}
> -
> -	return 1;
> -}
> -
>  /* returns nonzero if entire page is blank */
>  static int check_read_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct fsl_ifc_ctrl *ctrl,
>  			  u32 *eccstat, unsigned int bufnum)
> @@ -272,16 +246,14 @@ static void fsl_ifc_run_command(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  			if (errors == 15) {
>  				/*
>  				 * Uncorrectable error.
> -				 * OK only if the whole page is blank.
> +				 * We'll check for blank pages later.
>  				 *
>  				 * We disable ECCER reporting due to...
>  				 * erratum IFC-A002770 -- so report it now if we
>  				 * see an uncorrectable error in ECCSTAT.
>  				 */
> -				if (!is_blank(mtd, bufnum))
> -					ctrl->nand_stat |=
> -						IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER;
> -				break;
> +				ctrl->nand_stat |= IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER;
> +				printk("NAND flash read: error but continuing.\n");
>  			}
>  
>  			mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += errors;
> @@ -676,6 +648,40 @@ static int fsl_ifc_wait(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip)
>  	return nand_fsr | NAND_STATUS_WP;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * The controller does not check for bitflips in erased pages,
> + * therefore software must check instead.
> + */
> +static int check_erased_page(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf)
> +{
> +	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> +	u8 *ecc = chip->oob_poi;
> +	const int ecc_size = chip->ecc.bytes;
> +	const int pkt_size = chip->ecc.size;
> +	int i, res, bitflips = 0;
> +	struct mtd_oob_region oobregion = { };
> +	
> +	mtd_ooblayout_ecc(mtd, 0, &oobregion);
> +	ecc += oobregion.offset;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; ++i) {
> +		res = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(buf, pkt_size, ecc, ecc_size,
> +						  NULL, 0,
> +						  chip->ecc.strength);
> +		if (res < 0)
> +			mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;

		else
			mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += res;


> +
> +		bitflips = max(res, bitflips);
> +		buf += pkt_size;
> +		ecc += ecc_size;
> +	}
> +
> +	mtd_ooblayout_ecc(mtd, 1, &oobregion);
> +	BUG_ON(oobregion.length);

Probably something you should check at registration time only.

> +
> +	return bitflips;
> +}
> +
>  static int fsl_ifc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
>  			     uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
>  {
> @@ -687,11 +693,23 @@ static int fsl_ifc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	if (oob_required)
>  		fsl_ifc_read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
>  
> -	if (ctrl->nand_stat & IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER)
> -		dev_err(priv->dev, "NAND Flash ECC Uncorrectable Error\n");
> -
>  	if (ctrl->nand_stat != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC)
>  		mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> +	
> +	if (ctrl->nand_stat & IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER) {
> +		int res;
> +
> +		if (!oob_required)
> +			fsl_ifc_read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
> +
> +		printk("NAND flash: have error (%d)\n", nctrl->max_bitflips);
> +		res = check_erased_page(chip, buf);
> +		printk("NAND flash: but erased page says %d\n", res);
> +
> +		dev_err(priv->dev, "NAND Flash ECC Uncorrectable Error or erased page\n");
> +		return res;
> +	}
> +
>  
>  	return nctrl->max_bitflips;
>  }
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-21 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-19 12:13 fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek
2017-04-19 21:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-19 22:15   ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-19 22:27     ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-20 11:40       ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-20 12:15         ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-21 10:51         ` [PATCH] nand_base: optimize checking of erased buffers Pavel Machek
2017-05-17 11:27           ` Mason
2017-05-17 11:39             ` Mason
2017-05-17 11:52             ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-17 12:22           ` [PATCH] fsl_ifc_nand: fix handing of bit flips in erased nand Pavel Machek
2017-05-17 12:32             ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-17 13:00               ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-17 13:25                 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-17 20:03                   ` [PATCH] mtd: nand: fsl_ifc: fix handing of bit flips in erased pages Pavel Machek
2017-05-31 20:59                     ` [PATCHv2] " Pavel Machek
2017-05-31 22:59                       ` Darwin Dingel
2017-06-01  1:09                       ` Darwin Dingel
2017-06-01 13:12                         ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-01 13:21                           ` Boris Brezillon
2017-06-07  7:31                             ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-21 10:08   ` fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek
2017-04-21 10:12     ` Richard Weinberger
2017-04-21 12:04     ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-21 13:37     ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-21 13:49       ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-04-22  7:01         ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-22 10:40         ` [PATCH] tango_nand.c: fix ecc.stats_corrected in empty flash case Pavel Machek
2017-04-24  8:58           ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-04-24  9:03             ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-02  9:42             ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 11:52               ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-05-02 12:20                 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-03 20:02                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-03 20:04             ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-04  8:42               ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-12 15:34                 ` [PATCH] mtd: nand: tango: Update ecc_stats.corrected Marc Gonzalez
2017-05-15  8:56                   ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-15 20:47                   ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-17 12:04                 ` [PATCH] tango_nand.c: fix ecc.stats_corrected in empty flash case Pavel Machek
2017-04-23  9:58         ` tango_nand: is logic right in error cases? (was Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC?) Pavel Machek
2017-04-24  7:12           ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170421154903.2782cd06@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=Dipen.Dudhat@freescale.com \
    --cc=b44839@freescale.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.marshall@omicronenergy.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=prabhakar@freescale.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.