From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:00:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20170421220025.GC31650@fury> References: <0e4d82ca9cdc41c9d2a8b45258cd72659b4c2063.1492210847.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> <93377b77b9493d79de48741b030fa1b03f80094f.1492210847.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93377b77b9493d79de48741b030fa1b03f80094f.1492210847.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com Cc: gnurou@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, edubezval@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, andy@infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, sathyaosid@gmail.com List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips By currently I believe you mean after the earlier patch in this series is applied, correct? This one is dependent on the previous one? > are chained to the respective first level irqs. So there is no > need for explicitly unmasking the first level irq in this > driver. This patches removes this level 1 irq unmask support. > > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan For platform drivers x86: Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) Are you working with a specific maintainers to pull this in as a series? With so many subsystems, we need to coordinate to make sure we don't make a mess for Linus. Given the interdependencies, I'd recommend someone pull the series in as a whole - maybe into MFD? Lee, do you have a preference? -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center