From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:57513 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1172803AbdDXOrQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:47:16 -0400
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:47:14 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] xfs: introduce xfs_bmapi_remap
Message-ID: <20170424144714.GA29860@lst.de>
References: <20170412103013.9355-1-hch@lst.de> <20170412103013.9355-5-hch@lst.de> <20170412192827.GQ8502@birch.djwong.org> <20170419180757.GA26319@lst.de> <20170419183250.GI5193@birch.djwong.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170419183250.GI5193@birch.djwong.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: xfs
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:32:50AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Seems fine in testing here.  I was planning to push it for 4.12.

Ok.  Just been wondering because the for-next branch hasn't seen
any updated for a long time.