All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] virtio-net tx napi
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 02:35:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170425023512-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170424174930.82623-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 01:49:25PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> 
> Add napi for virtio-net transmit completion processing.


Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

> Changes:
>   v2 -> v3:
>     - convert __netif_tx_trylock to __netif_tx_lock on tx napi poll
>           ensure that the handler always cleans, to avoid deadlock
>     - unconditionally clean in start_xmit
>           avoid adding an unnecessary "if (use_napi)" branch
>     - remove virtqueue_disable_cb in patch 5/5
>           a noop in the common event_idx based loop
>     - document affinity_hint_set constraint
> 
>   v1 -> v2:
>     - disable by default
>     - disable unless affinity_hint_set
>           because cache misses add up to a third higher cycle cost,
> 	  e.g., in TCP_RR tests. This is not limited to the patch
> 	  that enables tx completion cleaning in rx napi.
>     - use trylock to avoid contention between tx and rx napi
>     - keep interrupts masked during xmit_more (new patch 5/5)
>           this improves cycles especially for multi UDP_STREAM, which
> 	  does not benefit from cleaning tx completions on rx napi.
>     - move free_old_xmit_skbs (new patch 3/5)
>           to avoid forward declaration
> 
>     not changed:
>     - deduplicate virnet_poll_tx and virtnet_poll_txclean
>           they look similar, but have differ too much to make it
> 	  worthwhile.
>     - delay netif_wake_subqueue for more than 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS
>           evaluated, but made no difference
>     - patch 1/5
> 
>   RFC -> v1:
>     - dropped vhost interrupt moderation patch:
>           not needed and likely expensive at light load
>     - remove tx napi weight
>         - always clean all tx completions
>         - use boolean to toggle tx-napi, instead
>     - only clean tx in rx if tx-napi is enabled
>         - then clean tx before rx
>     - fix: add missing braces in virtnet_freeze_down
>     - testing: add 4KB TCP_RR + UDP test results
> 
> Based on previous patchsets by Jason Wang:
> 
>   [RFC V7 PATCH 0/7] enable tx interrupts for virtio-net
>   http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1505.3/00245.html
> 
> 
> Before commit b0c39dbdc204 ("virtio_net: don't free buffers in xmit
> ring") the virtio-net driver would free transmitted packets on
> transmission of new packets in ndo_start_xmit and, to catch the edge
> case when no new packet is sent, also in a timer at 10HZ.
> 
> A timer can cause long stalls. VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY avoids stalls
> due to low free descriptor count. It does not address a stalls due to
> low socket SO_SNDBUF. Increasing timer frequency decreases that stall
> time, but increases interrupt rate and, thus, cycle count.
> 
> Currently, with no timer, packets are freed only at ndo_start_xmit.
> Latency of consume_skb is now unbounded. To avoid a deadlock if a sock
> reaches SO_SNDBUF, packets are orphaned on tx. This breaks TCP small
> queues.
> 
> Reenable TCP small queues by removing the orphan. Instead of using a
> timer, convert the driver to regular tx napi. This does not have the
> unresolved stall issue and does not have any frequency to tune.
> 
> By keeping interrupts enabled by default, napi increases tx
> interrupt rate. VIRTIO_F_EVENT_IDX avoids sending an interrupt if
> one is already unacknowledged, so makes this more feasible today.
> Combine that with an optimization that brings interrupt rate
> back in line with the existing version for most workloads:
> 
> Tx completion cleaning on rx interrupts elides most explicit tx
> interrupts by relying on the fact that many rx interrupts fire.
> 
> Tested by running {1, 10, 100} {TCP, UDP} STREAM, RR, 4K_RR benchmarks
> from a guest to a server on the host, on an x86_64 Haswell. The guest
> runs 4 vCPUs pinned to 4 cores. vhost and the test server are
> pinned to a core each.
> 
> All results are the median of 5 runs, with variance well < 10%.
> Used neper (github.com/google/neper) as test process.
> 
> Napi increases single stream throughput, but increases cycle cost.
> The optimizations bring this down. The previous patchset saw a
> regression with UDP_STREAM, which does not benefit from cleaning tx
> interrupts in rx napi. This regression is now gone for 10x, 100x.
> Remaining difference is higher 1x TCP_STREAM, lower 1x UDP_STREAM.
> 
> The latest results are with process, rx napi and tx napi affine to
> the same core. All numbers are lower than the previous patchset.
> 
> 
>              upstream     napi
> TCP_STREAM:
> 1x:
>   Mbps          27816    39805
>   Gcycles         274      285
> 
> 10x:
>   Mbps          42947    42531
>   Gcycles         300      296
> 
> 100x:
>   Mbps          31830    28042
>   Gcycles         279      269
> 
> TCP_RR Latency (us):
> 1x:
>   p50              21       21
>   p99              27       27
>   Gcycles         180      167
> 
> 10x:
>   p50              40       39
>   p99              52       52
>   Gcycles         214      211
> 
> 100x:
>   p50             281      241
>   p99             411      337
>   Gcycles         218      226
> 
> TCP_RR 4K:
> 1x:
>   p50              28       29
>   p99              34       36
>   Gcycles         177      167
> 
> 10x:
>   p50              70       71
>   p99              85      134
>   Gcycles         213      214
> 
> 100x:
>   p50             442      611
>   p99             802      785
>   Gcycles         237      216
> 
> UDP_STREAM:
> 1x:
>   Mbps          29468    26800
>   Gcycles         284      293
> 
> 10x:
>   Mbps          29891    29978
>   Gcycles         285      312
> 
> 100x:
>   Mbps          30269    30304
>   Gcycles         318      316
> 
> UDP_RR:
> 1x:
>   p50              19       19
>   p99              23       23
>   Gcycles         180      173
> 
> 10x:
>   p50              35       40
>   p99              54       64
>   Gcycles         245      237
> 
> 100x:
>   p50             234      286
>   p99             484      473
>   Gcycles         224      214
> 
> Note that GSO is enabled, so 4K RR still translates to one packet
> per request.
> 
> Lower throughput at 100x vs 10x can be (at least in part)
> explained by looking at bytes per packet sent (nstat). It likely
> also explains the lower throughput of 1x for some variants.
> 
> upstream:
> 
>  N=1   bytes/pkt=16581
>  N=10  bytes/pkt=61513
>  N=100 bytes/pkt=51558
> 
> at_rx:
> 
>  N=1   bytes/pkt=65204
>  N=10  bytes/pkt=65148
>  N=100 bytes/pkt=56840
> 
> Willem de Bruijn (5):
>   virtio-net: napi helper functions
>   virtio-net: transmit napi
>   virtio-net: move free_old_xmit_skbs
>   virtio-net: clean tx descriptors from rx napi
>   virtio-net: keep tx interrupts disabled unless kick
> 
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-24 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-24 17:49 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] virtio-net tx napi Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] virtio-net: napi helper functions Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] virtio-net: transmit napi Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-25  8:36   ` Jason Wang
2017-04-25  8:36   ` Jason Wang
2017-04-25 14:32     ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] virtio-net: move free_old_xmit_skbs Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] virtio-net: clean tx descriptors from rx napi Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] virtio-net: keep tx interrupts disabled unless kick Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24 17:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-04-13  5:06   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13  5:06     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13 14:27     ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-04-13 14:27       ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-04-13 19:34       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13 19:34         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-04-24 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] virtio-net tx napi Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-04-24 23:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-04-25 13:09 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-24 17:49 Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170425023512-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.