From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3M5z-0006v1-Ol for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:31:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3M5y-0003b3-HK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:30:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:30:46 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20170426123046.GC4538@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <20170426033413.17192-1-famz@redhat.com> <20170426033413.17192-12-famz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170426033413.17192-12-famz@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 11/21] iotests: 085: Avoid image locking conflict List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, eblake@redhat.com, Max Reitz , qemu-block@nongnu.org Am 26.04.2017 um 05:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben: > In the case where we test the expected error when a blockdev-snapshot > target already has a backing image, the backing chain is opened multiple > times. This will be a problem when we use image locking, so use a > different backing file that is not already open. > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > --- > tests/qemu-iotests/085 | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > tests/qemu-iotests/085.out | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/085 b/tests/qemu-iotests/085 > index c53e97f..cc6efd8 100755 > --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/085 > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/085 > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ _cleanup() > rm -f "${TEST_DIR}/${i}-${snapshot_virt0}" > rm -f "${TEST_DIR}/${i}-${snapshot_virt1}" > done > - rm -f "${TEST_IMG}.1" "${TEST_IMG}.2" > + rm -f "${TEST_IMG}" "${TEST_IMG}.1" "${TEST_IMG}.2" "${TEST_IMG}.base" > > } > trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 > @@ -87,24 +87,26 @@ function create_group_snapshot() > } > > # ${1}: unique identifier for the snapshot filename > -# ${2}: true: open backing images; false: don't open them (default) > +# ${2}: extra_params to the blockdev-add command > +# ${3}: filename > +function do_blockdev_add() > +{ > + cmd="{ 'execute': 'blockdev-add', 'arguments': > + { 'driver': 'qcow2', 'node-name': 'snap_${1}', ${2} > + 'file': > + { 'driver': 'file', 'filename': '${3}', > + 'node-name': 'file_${1}' } } }" > + _send_qemu_cmd $h "${cmd}" "return" > +} > + > +# ${1}: unique identifier for the snapshot filename > function add_snapshot_image() > { > - if [ "${2}" = "true" ]; then > - extra_params="" > - else > - extra_params="'backing': '', " > - fi > base_image="${TEST_DIR}/$((${1}-1))-${snapshot_virt0}" > snapshot_file="${TEST_DIR}/${1}-${snapshot_virt0}" > _make_test_img -b "${base_image}" "$size" > mv "${TEST_IMG}" "${snapshot_file}" > - cmd="{ 'execute': 'blockdev-add', 'arguments': > - { 'driver': 'qcow2', 'node-name': 'snap_${1}', ${extra_params} > - 'file': > - { 'driver': 'file', 'filename': '${snapshot_file}', > - 'node-name': 'file_${1}' } } }" > - _send_qemu_cmd $h "${cmd}" "return" > + do_blockdev_add "$1" "'backing': '', " "${snapshot_file}" > } > > # ${1}: unique identifier for the snapshot filename > @@ -222,7 +224,11 @@ echo === Invalid command - snapshot node has a backing image === > echo > > SNAPSHOTS=$((${SNAPSHOTS}+1)) > -add_snapshot_image ${SNAPSHOTS} true > + > +_make_test_img "$size" > +mv "${TEST_IMG}" "${TEST_IMG}.base" The common idiom is: TEST_IMG="$TEST_IMG.base" _make_test_img "$size" This avoids using mv, which is helpful if we ever want to extend the testcase for non-file protocols. But I see that you just copied this from add_snapshot_image(), so it's preexisting and matter for a different patch/series. > +_make_test_img -b "${TEST_IMG}.base" "$size" > +do_blockdev_add ${SNAPSHOTS} "" "${TEST_IMG}" > blockdev_snapshot ${SNAPSHOTS} error Kevin