From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S966016AbdDZWFN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:05:13 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:36740 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S935817AbdDZWEw (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:04:52 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:04:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
        x86@kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/amd: don't set X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS if forced to
 zero
Message-ID: <20170426220448.sjsg4f7odacb2uz3@pd.tnic>
References: <20170425180014.7533-1-jgross@suse.com>
 <20170425182443.3ab75tkfosol2yk4@pd.tnic>
 <f3cf034d-1a26-cfce-cf67-ebaa3b377cfc@suse.com>
 <20170425191809.uvdt4jimnbvqbyf2@pd.tnic>
 <24b7ab61-69e6-192e-5bb7-2ef5cdaa28c3@suse.com>
 <20170426063556.vc2zmns3uscubuim@pd.tnic>
 <88dfeccc-61e9-20a7-e188-c3e5cb0f55d3@suse.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <88dfeccc-61e9-20a7-e188-c3e5cb0f55d3@suse.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 08:24:12PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> I'm not feeling strong about it. So if you want to test for
> X86_FEATURE_XENPV to avoid setting X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS I'm fine
> with it.
> 
> Will send V2 with that change.

And remove the corresponding

	clear_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS);

in xen_set_cpu_features().

So that we can set it once, only on !XENPV feature set.

/me looks again at the code...

Gah, except that we do

	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_XENPV);

and that runs as part of init_hypervisor() and it runs *after* c_init().

So, back to square one. :-\

So lemme try to explain again what I mean:

I'd like to have a generic way of detecting whether I'm running as a xen
guest at ->c_init() time and depending on the result of that detection,
to set X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS or not set it.

Does that make more sense?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.