All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, eblake@redhat.com,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 21/21] qemu-iotests: Add test case 153 for image locking
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:32:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170427013200.GE9205@lemon.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170426144948.GL4538@noname.str.redhat.com>

On Wed, 04/26 16:49, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 26.04.2017 um 05:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> 
> I'll do the actual review of the test case later, but I already have a
> question... Can we find a way to accept the expected lock losses on
> systems without OFD? I'm using RHEL 7 as my main development OS, so I
> wouldn't like having to deal with false positives there.

Split the lock loss cases to a separate case and _not_run? :)

> 
> Hm... And actually, printing a warning will probably invalidate all the
> other reference outputs, too. After all, every single invocation of
> qemu/qemu-img/qemu-io will print a warning. Maybe that's a bit too much
> even for manual users when they can't do anything about it (which is
> unlike the format probing warning that you can get rid of by simply
> changing your command line).

An idea: make locking=on/off/auto, and auto is on iff OFD is usable, otherwise
off. When user specifies locking=on but OFD is unusable, we print a warning.

Only in this on test case the warning will be printed on RHEL, and it's easy to
filter it out.

Fam

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-27  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-26  3:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 00/21] block: Image locking series Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 01/21] block: Make bdrv_perm_names public Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 02/21] block: Define BLK_PERM_MAX Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  9:36   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  2:03     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 03/21] block: Add, parse and store "force-share" option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 04/21] block: Respect "force-share" in perm propagating Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 05/21] qemu-img: Add --force-share option to subcommands Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 06/21] qemu-img: Update documentation for -U Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 07/21] qemu-io: Add --force-share option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 08/21] iotests: 030: Prepare for image locking Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 09/21] iotests: 046: " Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 10/21] iotests: 055: Don't attach the target image already for drive-backup Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 11/21] iotests: 085: Avoid image locking conflict Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:30   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  7:16     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 12/21] iotests: 087: Don't attach test image twice Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 13/21] iotests: 091: Quit QEMU before checking image Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:34   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  7:04     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 14/21] iotests: 172: Use separate images for multiple devices Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 15/21] tests: Use null-co:// instead of /dev/null as the dummy image Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 16/21] file-posix: Add 'locking' option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:41   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  2:29     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 17/21] tests: Disable image lock in test-replication Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 18/21] block: Reuse bs as backing hd for drive-backup sync=none Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:52   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 13:15     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:34       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  1:50         ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 19/21] osdep: Add qemu_lock_fd and qemu_unlock_fd Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:57   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 13:20     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:24       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 14:29       ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-04-27  1:40         ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 20/21] file-posix: Add image locking to perm operations Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:22   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  6:43     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-28 13:45   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-28 15:30     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-28 18:27       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 21/21] qemu-iotests: Add test case 153 for image locking Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:53   ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:49   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  1:32     ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2017-04-27  9:05       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 10:34         ` Fam Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170427013200.GE9205@lemon.lan \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.