From: guangrong.xiao@gmail.com To: pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> Subject: [PATCH 6/7] KVM: MMU: clarify fast_pf_fix_direct_spte Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 18:52:23 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170503105224.19049-7-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170503105224.19049-1-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> The writable spte can not be locklessly fixed and add a WARN_ON() to trigger the warning if something out of our mind happens, that is good for us to track if the log for writable spte is missed on the fast path Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c index ad6ee46..f6a74e7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c @@ -3225,6 +3225,15 @@ fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, WARN_ON(!sp->role.direct); /* + * the original spte can not be writable as only the spte which + * fulfills is_access_track_spte() or + * spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable() can be locklessly fixed, + * for the former, the W bit is always cleared, for the latter, + * there is nothing to do if it is already writable. + */ + WARN_ON(is_writable_pte(old_spte)); + + /* * Theoretically we could also set dirty bit (and flush TLB) here in * order to eliminate unnecessary PML logging. See comments in * set_spte. But fast_page_fault is very unlikely to happen with PML @@ -3239,7 +3248,7 @@ fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, if (cmpxchg64(sptep, old_spte, new_spte) != old_spte) return false; - if (is_writable_pte(new_spte) && !is_writable_pte(old_spte)) { + if (is_writable_pte(new_spte)) { /* * The gfn of direct spte is stable since it is * calculated by sp->gfn. -- 2.9.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: guangrong.xiao@gmail.com To: pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] KVM: MMU: clarify fast_pf_fix_direct_spte Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 18:52:23 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170503105224.19049-7-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170503105224.19049-1-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> The writable spte can not be locklessly fixed and add a WARN_ON() to trigger the warning if something out of our mind happens, that is good for us to track if the log for writable spte is missed on the fast path Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c index ad6ee46..f6a74e7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c @@ -3225,6 +3225,15 @@ fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, WARN_ON(!sp->role.direct); /* + * the original spte can not be writable as only the spte which + * fulfills is_access_track_spte() or + * spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable() can be locklessly fixed, + * for the former, the W bit is always cleared, for the latter, + * there is nothing to do if it is already writable. + */ + WARN_ON(is_writable_pte(old_spte)); + + /* * Theoretically we could also set dirty bit (and flush TLB) here in * order to eliminate unnecessary PML logging. See comments in * set_spte. But fast_page_fault is very unlikely to happen with PML @@ -3239,7 +3248,7 @@ fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, if (cmpxchg64(sptep, old_spte, new_spte) != old_spte) return false; - if (is_writable_pte(new_spte) && !is_writable_pte(old_spte)) { + if (is_writable_pte(new_spte)) { /* * The gfn of direct spte is stable since it is * calculated by sp->gfn. -- 2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 10:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-05-03 10:52 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: MMU: correct the behavior of mmu_spte_update_no_track guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: MMU: introduce possible_writable_spte_bitmap guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_write_protect_all_pages guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: MMU: enable KVM_WRITE_PROTECT_ALL_MEM guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: MMU: allow dirty log without write protect guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` guangrong.xiao [this message] 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] KVM: MMU: clarify fast_pf_fix_direct_spte guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: MMU: stop using mmu_spte_get_lockless under mmu-lock guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " guangrong.xiao 2017-05-03 12:28 ` [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect Paolo Bonzini 2017-05-03 12:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini 2017-05-03 14:50 ` Xiao Guangrong 2017-05-03 14:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong 2017-05-03 14:57 ` Paolo Bonzini 2017-05-03 14:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini 2017-05-04 3:36 ` Xiao Guangrong 2017-05-04 3:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong 2017-05-04 7:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2017-05-04 7:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini 2017-05-23 2:23 ` Xiao Guangrong 2017-05-23 2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong 2017-05-29 16:48 ` Paolo Bonzini 2017-05-29 16:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini 2017-06-09 3:19 ` Xiao Guangrong 2017-06-09 3:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong 2017-06-05 7:36 ` Jay Zhou 2017-06-05 7:36 ` Jay Zhou 2017-06-06 2:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20170503105224.19049-7-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com \ --to=guangrong.xiao@gmail.com \ --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \ --cc=xiaoguangrong@tencent.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 6/7] KVM: MMU: clarify fast_pf_fix_direct_spte' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.