From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750905AbdEEQe4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 12:34:56 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:47964 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757AbdEEQez (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 12:34:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 17:34:49 +0100 From: Jamie Iles To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Jamie Iles , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: don't remove SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE for traced tasks. Message-ID: <20170505163449.zk5nf4ca6b6jlvtt@cedar> References: <20170504125136.11352-1-jamie.iles@oracle.com> <20170505162606.GA32256@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170505162606.GA32256@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Oleg, On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 06:26:07PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > I am sorry for being slow... yes, probably we should start with this > simple change, and perhaps we do not really need anything else. But > let me think about this till Monday, perhaps we can remove this "clear > SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE" logic in force_sig_info() altogether. No problem, I sent the patch to keep it on my own radar :) Jamie