From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver/net: remove unnecessary macro for unused variables Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 17:19:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20170515091942.GB3102@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <20170512103303.93161-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <493e9af9-a800-4642-e40f-ab15e234d7ad@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8171D3B5 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 11:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <493e9af9-a800-4642-e40f-ab15e234d7ad@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 5/12/2017 11:33 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > remove __rte_unused instances that are not required. > > > > Hi Yuanhan, > > Does this kind of refactoring patches, specially the ones covering > multiple drivers, cause trouble (more conflicts) to you while getting > patches for stable trees? Yes, it's likely. > If so, I can postpone them through the end of integration deadline. I don't think it's necessary though. If a conflict happens, I will ask the author to do backport :) --yliu > But postponing them most probably will mean rebasing these patches > later, so if this is not causing any problem for you, please let me know > so that I can get them earlier. > > Thanks, > ferruh