From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAFWQ-0001e3-5X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:54:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAFWN-0003h8-5K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:54:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 13:54:39 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20170515125439.GA1201@stefanha-x1.localdomain> References: <20170505021500.19315-1-eblake@redhat.com> <20170505021500.19315-3-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170505021500.19315-3-eblake@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [RFC PATCH 2/2] block: Exploit BDRV_BLOCK_EOF for larger zero blocks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, Fam Zheng , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:15:00PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > When we have a BSD with unallocated clusters, but asking the status s/BSD/BDS/ --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZGaUPAAoJEJykq7OBq3PI+XcH/RNCIBtn0wbdPFe3Qgmrdtzc MWrQ9tBufeuAEDWa7WIQqF9iDr7r1btBPfGrN8P9YcpBK+ItGtRivTcpgSPKg34v d0Jv3AnoT+vyDhQlp568ajNheFqj866S80TB295IfZFmN2Ye/J1eXWO+3LTXrpHU CENW9SlYxELJ2FxyPG1Q28930UCBmnCPfeH0xYragwPj74tyqbuKbqyUMMa01ey1 1N16J512YWTZj646Ki+zR1VdMUdosbNDbFZj7pivTEjNoNYLJCAENXTPUw6gX87E lF0mqB/j9E/XDL4WY2iJkIFDOuPLsxnub+GQVnXySnmmCppxyAfqnFSx8oGg8QI= =w1PG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--