From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751234AbdEPGGW (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 16 May 2017 02:06:22 -0400
Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:47982 "EHLO 1wt.eu"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750765AbdEPGGV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 16 May 2017 02:06:21 -0400
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 08:06:13 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series
Message-ID: <20170516060613.GA17551@1wt.eu>
References: <CALQ-SOCrEyJ9TQMKT8EdvjAJ_cY-6t48kfWs_VJ=FNn90ZPmGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170516052009.GA17400@1wt.eu>
 <CALQ-SODhbky=pHUK1c6S91OE0H+kBS=7UATSNBud82a-hAunQA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALQ-SODhbky=pHUK1c6S91OE0H+kBS=7UATSNBud82a-hAunQA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:53:50PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote:
> Is there any particular reason that the CVE appears to be filed
> against 4.4.60? Or is this just a mistake?
> 
> http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2016-10229/

I have no idea why. Maybe they mentionned the current version at the
moment the CVE was issued (which seems to match). In fact this bug was
discovered as being a vulnerability long after the bug was fixed.

Willy