All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 11:30:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170516113019.0bfcd516@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517001539.171b05fd39bbdd4ce36566c2@kernel.org>

On Wed, 17 May 2017 00:15:39 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:


> > It appears that the kprobe_optimizer work thread call happened after
> > the init pages were freed, causing alternative.c to give the above
> > warning because the text that is being unoptimized happens to no longer
> > exist.  
> 
> Ah, I see. I need to check that case. Actually for the module
> init text area, kill_kprobe() correctly kicks kill_optimized_kprobe()
> so it should safe. But above case is on the init-text in kernel
> itself. I guess module_notifier may not be called for that area...

Hmm, what happens if you add a kprobe to a module, remove it, and then
remove the module. If the module is still loaded when it is removed,
wouldn't that cause the optimized probe to be delayed? Wouldn't that
open a race where the optimizer work queue can be called when no module
exists?

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-16 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-16 13:48 WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270 Steven Rostedt
2017-05-16 15:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-05-16 15:30   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-05-16 16:27     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-05-16 21:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-17  1:38     ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170516113019.0bfcd516@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.