All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Move postpone selftests to core from early_initcall
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 09:00:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170517160015.GJ3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517111435.7388c033@gandalf.local.home>

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:14:35AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> I hit the following lockdep splat when booting with ftrace selftests
> enabled, as well as CONFIG_PREEMPT and LOCKDEP.
> 
>  Testing dynamic ftrace ops #1:
>  (1 0 1 0 0)
>  (1 1 2 0 0)
>  (2 1 3 0 169)
>  (2 2 4 0 50066)
>  ------------[ cut here ]------------
>  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13 at kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:202 check_init_srcu_struct+0x60/0x70
>  Modules linked in:
>  CPU: 0 PID: 13 Comm: rcu_tasks_kthre Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1-test+ #587
>  Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v02.05 05/07/2012
>  task: ffff880119628040 task.stack: ffffc900006a4000
>  RIP: 0010:check_init_srcu_struct+0x60/0x70
>  RSP: 0000:ffffc900006a7d98 EFLAGS: 00010246
>  RAX: 0000000000000246 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
>  RDX: ffff880119628040 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: ffffffff81e5fb40
>  RBP: ffffc900006a7e20 R08: 00000023b403c000 R09: 0000000000000001
>  R10: ffffc900006a7e40 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff81e5fb40
>  R13: 0000000000000286 R14: ffff880119628040 R15: ffffc900006a7e98
>  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88011ea00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>  CR2: ffff88011edff000 CR3: 0000000001e0f000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
>  Call Trace:
>   ? __synchronize_srcu+0x6e/0x140
>   ? lock_acquire+0xdc/0x1d0
>   ? ktime_get_mono_fast_ns+0x5d/0xb0
>   synchronize_srcu+0x6f/0x110
>   ? synchronize_srcu+0x6f/0x110
>   rcu_tasks_kthread+0x20a/0x540
>   kthread+0x114/0x150
>   ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x70/0x70
>   ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
>   ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x40
>  Code: f6 83 70 06 00 00 03 49 89 c5 74 0d be 01 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 42 fa ff ff 4c 89 ee 4c 89 e7 e8 b7 42 75 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d c3 <0f> ff eb aa 66 90 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00
>  ---[ end trace 5c3f4206ce50f6ac ]---
> 
> What happens is that the selftests include a creating of a dynamically
> allocated ftrace_ops, which requires the use of synchronize_rcu_tasks()
> which uses srcu, and triggers the above warning.
> 
> It appears that synchronize_rcu_tasks() is not set up at early_initcall(),
> but it is at core_initcall(). By moving the tests down to that location
> works out properly.
> 
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Acked-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

But it looks like I need to raise the priority of making SRCU
safe throughout boot, including the "mid-boot dead zone"...

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 3f2aed4..fcc9a2d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static __init int init_trace_selftests(void)
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -early_initcall(init_trace_selftests);
> +core_initcall(init_trace_selftests);
>  #else
>  static inline int run_tracer_selftest(struct tracer *type)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2017-05-17 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17 15:14 [PATCH] tracing: Move postpone selftests to core from early_initcall Steven Rostedt
2017-05-17 16:00 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170517160015.GJ3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.