All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: guro@fb.com, mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, kernel-team@fb.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,oom: fix oom invocation issues
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 07:03:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201705180703.JGH95344.SOHJtFFMOQFLOV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517194316.GA30517@castle>

Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:14:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 17-05-17 16:26:20, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > [   25.781882] Out of memory: Kill process 492 (allocate) score 899 or sacrifice child
> > > [   25.783874] Killed process 492 (allocate) total-vm:2052368kB, anon-rss:1894576kB, file-rss:4kB, shmem-rss:0kB
> > 
> > Are there any oom_reaper messages? Could you provide the full kernel log
> > please?
> 
> Sure. Sorry, it was too bulky, so I've cut the line about oom_reaper by mistake.
> Here it is:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [   25.721494] allocate invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x14280ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null),  order=0, oom_score_adj=0
> [   25.725658] allocate cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0

> [   25.759892] Node 0 DMA32 free:44700kB min:44704kB low:55880kB high:67056kB active_anon:1944216kB inactive_anon:204kB active_file:592kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:304kB present:2080640kB managed:2031972kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:11336kB slab_unreclaimable:9784kB kernel_stack:1776kB pagetables:6932kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB

> [   25.781882] Out of memory: Kill process 492 (allocate) score 899 or sacrifice child
> [   25.783874] Killed process 492 (allocate) total-vm:2052368kB, anon-rss:1894576kB, file-rss:4kB, shmem-rss:0kB

> [   25.785680] allocate: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x14280ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null)
> [   25.786797] allocate cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0

This is a side effect of commit 9a67f6488eca926f ("mm: consolidate GFP_NOFAIL
checks in the allocator slowpath") which I noticed at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e7f932bf-313a-917d-6304-81528aca5994@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp .

> [   25.804499] Node 0 DMA32 free:251876kB min:44704kB low:55880kB high:67056kB active_anon:1737368kB inactive_anon:204kB active_file:592kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:304kB present:2080640kB managed:2031972kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:10312kB slab_unreclaimable:9784kB kernel_stack:1776kB pagetables:6932kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:700kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB

> [   25.817589] allocate invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x0(), nodemask=(null),  order=0, oom_score_adj=0
> [   25.818821] allocate cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0

Since pagefault_out_of_memory() is unconditionally called if a normal allocation failed,
that commit made pagefault_out_of_memory() to be called if current thread was selected as
an OOM victim, despite the system is no longer under memory pressure because the OOM reaper
has reclaimed memory.

> [   25.835784] Node 0 DMA32 free:1934360kB min:44704kB low:55880kB high:67056kB active_anon:57104kB inactive_anon:204kB active_file:416kB inactive_file:2476kB unevictable:0kB writepending:424kB present:2080640kB managed:2031972kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:10236kB slab_unreclaimable:9584kB kernel_stack:1776kB pagetables:3604kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:144kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB

> [   25.863078] Out of memory: Kill process 233 (firewalld) score 10 or sacrifice child
> [   25.863634] Killed process 233 (firewalld) total-vm:246076kB, anon-rss:20956kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: guro@fb.com, mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, kernel-team@fb.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,oom: fix oom invocation issues
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 07:03:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201705180703.JGH95344.SOHJtFFMOQFLOV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517194316.GA30517@castle>

Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:14:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 17-05-17 16:26:20, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > [   25.781882] Out of memory: Kill process 492 (allocate) score 899 or sacrifice child
> > > [   25.783874] Killed process 492 (allocate) total-vm:2052368kB, anon-rss:1894576kB, file-rss:4kB, shmem-rss:0kB
> > 
> > Are there any oom_reaper messages? Could you provide the full kernel log
> > please?
> 
> Sure. Sorry, it was too bulky, so I've cut the line about oom_reaper by mistake.
> Here it is:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [   25.721494] allocate invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x14280ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null),  order=0, oom_score_adj=0
> [   25.725658] allocate cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0

> [   25.759892] Node 0 DMA32 free:44700kB min:44704kB low:55880kB high:67056kB active_anon:1944216kB inactive_anon:204kB active_file:592kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:304kB present:2080640kB managed:2031972kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:11336kB slab_unreclaimable:9784kB kernel_stack:1776kB pagetables:6932kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB

> [   25.781882] Out of memory: Kill process 492 (allocate) score 899 or sacrifice child
> [   25.783874] Killed process 492 (allocate) total-vm:2052368kB, anon-rss:1894576kB, file-rss:4kB, shmem-rss:0kB

> [   25.785680] allocate: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x14280ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null)
> [   25.786797] allocate cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0

This is a side effect of commit 9a67f6488eca926f ("mm: consolidate GFP_NOFAIL
checks in the allocator slowpath") which I noticed at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e7f932bf-313a-917d-6304-81528aca5994@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp .

> [   25.804499] Node 0 DMA32 free:251876kB min:44704kB low:55880kB high:67056kB active_anon:1737368kB inactive_anon:204kB active_file:592kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:304kB present:2080640kB managed:2031972kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:10312kB slab_unreclaimable:9784kB kernel_stack:1776kB pagetables:6932kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:700kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB

> [   25.817589] allocate invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x0(), nodemask=(null),  order=0, oom_score_adj=0
> [   25.818821] allocate cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0

Since pagefault_out_of_memory() is unconditionally called if a normal allocation failed,
that commit made pagefault_out_of_memory() to be called if current thread was selected as
an OOM victim, despite the system is no longer under memory pressure because the OOM reaper
has reclaimed memory.

> [   25.835784] Node 0 DMA32 free:1934360kB min:44704kB low:55880kB high:67056kB active_anon:57104kB inactive_anon:204kB active_file:416kB inactive_file:2476kB unevictable:0kB writepending:424kB present:2080640kB managed:2031972kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:10236kB slab_unreclaimable:9584kB kernel_stack:1776kB pagetables:3604kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:144kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB

> [   25.863078] Out of memory: Kill process 233 (firewalld) score 10 or sacrifice child
> [   25.863634] Killed process 233 (firewalld) total-vm:246076kB, anon-rss:20956kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-17 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17 15:26 Roman Gushchin
2017-05-17 15:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-05-17 16:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-17 16:14   ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-17 19:43   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-05-17 19:43     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-05-17 22:03     ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2017-05-17 22:03       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-18  8:47       ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18  8:47         ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18  9:00         ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18  9:00           ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18 13:20           ` Roman Gushchin
2017-05-18 13:20             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-05-18 13:57           ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-18 13:57             ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-18 14:29             ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18 14:29               ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18 14:57               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-18 14:57                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-18 15:07                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18 15:07                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18 15:01               ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18 15:01                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18  8:01     ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18  8:01       ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201705180703.JGH95344.SOHJtFFMOQFLOV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] mm,oom: fix oom invocation issues' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.