From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: spear_adc driver help needed ?
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 09:41:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170518094146.6504821a@free-electrons.com> (raw)
Hello Jonathan,
I've been working on a SPEAr600 platform recently, which uses the
spear_adc driver, and was about to start working on moving the driver
out of staging... only to discover in 4.12-rc1 that you already moved
it out of staging.
In the commit log that moves it out of staging, you're saying:
There are some unanswered questions due to disagreements between the code
and various datasheets (including between different datasheets for the same
part).
I don't think that is necessarily a reason to keep it in staging however.
I'm partly posting this patch inorder to reignite debate and with a bit
of luck find someone who has one of these to test!
What are the unanswered questions you are talking about?
Also, I am currently using the driver on a SPEAr600 device, so I can do
some testing.
The driver has support for the SPEAr3xx, but it isn't used anywhere:
there is no compatible string for it, and nowhere is old-style probing
used for "spear-adc".
So I'm thinking of:
- Dropping SPEAr3xx support, because it's unused. This will also
remove the ugly checks done on the compatible string all over the
place.
- Moving to a "base + offset" style of register accesses, rather than
the struct-based accesses.
What do you think ?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next reply other threads:[~2017-05-18 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-18 7:41 Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-05-21 14:33 ` spear_adc driver help needed ? Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-22 5:37 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170518094146.6504821a@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.