From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46648 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750760AbdESIMJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2017 04:12:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 10:12:04 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger?= Meier Cc: J William Piggott , util-linux Subject: Re: versioning Message-ID: <20170519081204.vvel4yq63i7e4wwq@ws.net.home> References: <20170517074741.ltxnoawwvj56gc3m@ws.net.home> <591C8A09.6070100@gmail.com> <201705172107.49456.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> <20170517210953.dskdxcr3rdmbtvgs@ws.net.home> <20170518103640.3dedmk7lat74biev@ws.net.home> <24e52021-2e94-68a7-bd8c-51362af1d749@gmx.com> <20170518195648.gxhsd4zak57wfcg3@ws.net.home> <2d5ad507-f51c-7b1b-3aa3-355609cb609c@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <2d5ad507-f51c-7b1b-3aa3-355609cb609c@gmx.de> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:55:41PM +0200, Rüdiger Meier wrote: > It should not be a problem to delete tags like it's no problem to delete > branches. Only rebasing branches or re-creating conflicting tags could be > annoying or at least confusing. It should be re-taged rather than deleted and it's the problem. I don't think it's important after the years. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com