All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: rockchip: check link status when validating device
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 18:00:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170524010014.GA109842@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fea7598-501e-6131-612a-977f005e9a2b@rock-chips.com>

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:54:14AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> 在 2017/5/24 2:00, Brian Norris 写道:
> >On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:58:27PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> >>This patch checks the link status before reading and
> >>writing configure space of devices attached to the RC.
> >>If the link status is down, we shouldn't try to access
> >>the devices.
> >
> >I'm curious, in what situations are you seeing the link down? In all the
> >cases where I can manage to screw up my endpoint and see system aborts
> >due to config accesses, this check still says the link is up. Presumably
> >you have some test cases that benefit from this though.

NB: Bjorn asked a similar question in a different form. The underlying
concern though, is that this is racy.

> Of course. This patch doesn't prevent all these cases, for instance,
> you do a memory read/write in the EP function driver, since it doesn't
> call these two APIs at all.

Of course. I'm only talking about config accesses.

> The reason for me to added this check is that I saw a external abort
> down to rockchip_pcie_rd_own_conf, of which I highly suspected was that
> the link was re-init or total broken at that time.

I've seen plenty of aborts in this function as well, but I've verified
that the link was still reported "up" in all the cases I could reproduce.

So, do you "suspect" or did you "prove"? e.g., log cases where this
check actually helps?

And to Bjorn's point: do you know *why* such cases were hit? That would
help to understand if the cases you're worrying about are hopelessly
racy, or if there's some way to ensure synchronization.

Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-24  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-19  6:58 [PATCH] PCI: rockchip: check link status when validating device Shawn Lin
2017-05-23 18:00 ` Brian Norris
2017-05-24  0:54   ` Shawn Lin
2017-05-24  1:00     ` Brian Norris [this message]
2017-05-24  1:14       ` Shawn Lin
2017-05-24  1:25         ` Brian Norris
2017-05-23 18:44 ` Brian Norris
2017-05-23 19:36   ` [PATCH] PCI: Make error code types consistent in pci_{read,write}_config_* Brian Norris
2017-05-23 19:36     ` Brian Norris
2017-05-25  6:50     ` Keith Busch
2017-05-26 21:40     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-05-26 21:40       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-05-23 19:44 ` [PATCH] PCI: rockchip: check link status when validating device Bjorn Helgaas
2017-05-24  1:04   ` Shawn Lin
2017-05-24  1:04     ` Shawn Lin
2017-05-24  1:15     ` Brian Norris
2017-05-24 21:33       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-05-24 21:43         ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170524010014.GA109842@google.com \
    --to=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.