From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFY0x-0007c4-Ol for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 23:40:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFY0u-0000xc-Mk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 23:40:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFY0u-0000uA-Hq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 23:40:08 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EABF5D68D for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 03:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:40:00 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170530034000.GA10390@lemon.lan> References: <20170509173559.31598-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20170509173559.31598-4-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <87tw4cn7sh.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tw4cn7sh.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau , qemu-devel@nongnu.org I noticed you were wondering what happend to this message in the patchew thread: http://patchew.org/QEMU/20170509173559.31598-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com/ Markus, apparently this is because of the unusual "In-Reply-To" header of your message, which confuses patchew: In-Reply-To: <20170509173559.31598-4-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau"'s message of "Tue, 9 May 2017 20:35:45 +0300") Is this an extension of your email client, or a standard? In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.4: > The "References:" and "In-Reply-To:" field each contain one or more > unique message identifiers, optionally separated by CFWS. > > The message identifier (msg-id) is similar in syntax to an angle-addr > construct without the internal CFWS. > > message-id = "Message-ID:" msg-id CRLF > > in-reply-to = "In-Reply-To:" 1*msg-id CRLF > > references = "References:" 1*msg-id CRLF I can imagine if consider CFWS, patchew should probably just work (I can fix that), but it's still good to understand this. Fam