From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] net/failsafe: support offload capabilities Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:23:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20170531082309.072c873d@xeon-e3> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Gaetan Rivet Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f49.google.com (mail-pg0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508AF2B88 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 17:23:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id u187so9433333pgb.0 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 08:23:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 29 May 2017 15:42:20 +0200 Gaetan Rivet wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet > Acked-by: Olga Shern > --- > doc/guides/nics/features/failsafe.ini | 6 ++ > drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_ops.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Once again what about case of dumb synthetic NIC combined with SR-IOV VF? The VF has offloads the virtual NIC does not. What about late plugin. how do you program the offloads of the later arriving VF device.