From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 08/15] spmi: pmic_arb: use appropriate flow handler Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:03:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20170531190310.GF20170@codeaurora.org> References: <1496147943-25822-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> <1496147943-25822-9-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:43622 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751015AbdEaTDN (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 May 2017 15:03:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1496147943-25822-9-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Kiran Gunda Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar , Christophe JAILLET , David Collins , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, adharmap@quicinc.com, aghayal@qti.qualcomm.com On 05/30, Kiran Gunda wrote: > From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar > > The current code uses handle_level_irq flow handler even if the > trigger type of the interrupt is edge. This can lead to missing > of an edge transition that happens when the interrupt is being > handled. The level flow handler masks the interrupt while it is > being handled, so if an edge transition happens at that time, > that edge is lost. > > Use an edge flow handler for edge type interrupts which ensures > that the interrupt stays enabled while being handled - at least > until it triggers at which point the flow handler sets the > IRQF_PENDING flag and only then masks the interrupt. That > IRQF_PENDING state indicates an edge transition happened while > the interrupt was being handled and the handler is called again. > > Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar > Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda Do we have any edge interrupts in the tree right now? At least RTC seems to be using edge... This should go back to stable with a Fixes tag. > --- > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c > index 1d23df0..ad34491 100644 > --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c > @@ -625,6 +625,12 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type) > } > > qpnpint_spmi_write(d, QPNPINT_REG_SET_TYPE, &type, sizeof(type)); > + > + if (flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH doesn't seem appropriate to use here. We're really just testing to see if the type is an edge type, not if it's BOTH edges. > + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_edge_irq); > + else > + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_level_irq); > + And we already have code that does that check: if (flow_type & (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING)) so just put the irq_set_handler_locked() calls in those if statements please. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project