From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751666AbdFGIqv (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:46:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:32843 "EHLO mail-wr0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538AbdFGIqr (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:46:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:46:42 +0200 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Richard Weinberger Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Boris Brezillon , Marek Vasut , Artem Bityutskiy , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: block2mtd: Add support for specifying MTD write size and subpage shift Message-ID: <20170607084642.GG4690@pali> References: <1496418222-23483-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <1496418222-23483-3-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20170605112145.GE14675@pali> <20170605112508.GF14675@pali> <79f3b92f-5be4-8d46-985d-0b38cffd6032@nod.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <79f3b92f-5be4-8d46-985d-0b38cffd6032@nod.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 05 June 2017 13:27:18 Richard Weinberger wrote: > Pali, > > Am 05.06.2017 um 13:25 schrieb Pali Rohár: > > On Monday 05 June 2017 13:23:22 Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> Pali, > >> > >> Am 05.06.2017 um 13:21 schrieb Pali Rohár: > >>> On Friday 02 June 2017 18:13:02 Richard Weinberger wrote: > >>>> Pali, > >>>> > >>>> Am 02.06.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Pali Rohár: > >>>>> It is needed for creating emulated devices suitable for using in UBI layer > >>>>> and with UBIFS. > >>>> > >>>> Why? > >>> > >>> ubifs depends on write size of nand. And without those parameters as > >>> specified in cover letter I'm unable to mount N900 rootfs image exported > >>> via block2mtd. ubifs reject such image. > >> > >> Hmm, so you render block2mtd into a semi-NAND chip? :) > > > > Probably you can call it like that. But it is still MTD device... > > This is what I meant in my other mail. > You add NAND specific properties but still denote it as MTD_RAM/ROM. > I'm not sure whether this is a good idea. Ok, lets wait what other people think. At least patches like fallback or check should be less problematic and could be applied separately. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@gmail.com