On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:23:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >From: Michal Hocko > >movable_node kernel parameter allows to make hotplugable NUMA >nodes to put all the hotplugable memory into movable zone which >allows more or less reliable memory hotremove. At least this >is the case for the NUMA nodes present during the boot (see >find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes). > When movable_node is enabled, we would have overlapped zones, right? To be specific, only ZONE_MOVABLE could have memory ranges belongs to other zones. This looks a little different in the whole ZONE design. >This is not the case for the memory hotplug, though. > > echo online > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXYZ/status > >will default to a kernel zone (usually ZONE_NORMAL) unless the >particular memblock is already in the movable zone range which is not ^^^ Here is memblock or a memory_block? >the case normally when onlining the memory from the udev rule context >for a freshly hotadded NUMA node. The only option currently is to have a So the semantic you want to change here is to make the memory_block in ZONE_MOVABLE when movable_node is enabled. Besides this, movable_node is enabled, what other requirements? Like, this memory_block should next to current ZONE_MOVABLE ? or something else? >special udev rule to echo online_movable to all memblocks belonging to >such a node which is rather clumsy. Not the mention this is inconsistent ^^^ Hmm... "Not to mentions" looks more understandable. BTW, I am not a native speaker. If this usage is correct, just ignore this comment. >as well because what ended up in the movable zone during the boot will >end up in a kernel zone after hotremove & hotadd without special care. > >It would be nice to reuse memblock_is_hotpluggable but the runtime >hotplug doesn't have that information available because the boot and >hotplug paths are not shared and it would be really non trivial to >make them use the same code path because the runtime hotplug doesn't >play with the memblock allocator at all. > >Teach move_pfn_range that MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP can use the movable zone if >movable_node is enabled and the range doesn't overlap with the existing >normal zone. This should provide a reasonable default onlining strategy. > >Strictly speaking the semantic is not identical with the boot time >initialization because find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes covers only the >hotplugable range as described by the BIOS/FW. From my experience this >is usually a full node though (except for Node0 which is special and >never goes away completely). If this turns out to be a problem in the >real life we can tweak the code to store hotplug flag into memblocks >but let's keep this simple now. > Let me try to understand your purpose of this change. If a memblock has MEMBLOCK_HOTPLU set, it would be in ZONE_MOVABLE during bootup. While a hotplugged memory_block would be in ZONE_NORMAL without special care. So you want to make sure when movable_node is enabled, the hotplugged memory_block would be in ZONE_MOVABLE. Is this correct? One more thing is do we have MEMBLOCK_HOTPLU for a hotplugged memory_block? >Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko >--- > -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me