From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751578AbdFOP5j (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 11:57:39 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:47020 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750737AbdFOP5i (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 11:57:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:57:35 -0500 From: Kim Phillips To: Mark Rutland , Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, robh@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add support for the ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension Message-Id: <20170615105735.b89183a9190a261d3b8d132a@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20170612112048.69561e8d067488e8689de755@arm.com> References: <1496676177-29356-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <20170612110823.GA27319@leverpostej> <20170612112048.69561e8d067488e8689de755@arm.com> Organization: ARM X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:20:48 -0500 Kim Phillips wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:08:23 +0100 > Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 04:22:52PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > This is the sixth posting of the patches previously posted here: ... > > Kim, do you have any version of the userspace side that we could look > > at? > > > > For review, it would be really helpful to have something that can poke > > the PMU, even if it's incomplete or lacking polish. > > Here's the latest push, based on a a couple of prior versions of this > driver: > > http://linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-kp.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/armspev0.1 > > I don't seem to be able to get any SPE data output after rebasing on > this version of the driver. Still don't know why at the moment... Bisected to commit e38ba76deef "perf tools: force uncore events to system wide monitoring". So, using record with specifying a -C explicitly now produces SPE data, but only a couple of valid records at the beginning of each buffer; the rest is filled with PADding (0's). I see Mark's latest comments have found a possible issue in the perf aux buffer handling code in the driver, and that the driver does some memset of padding (0's) itself; could that be responsible for the above behaviour? Thanks, Kim From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kim.phillips@arm.com (Kim Phillips) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:57:35 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add support for the ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension In-Reply-To: <20170612112048.69561e8d067488e8689de755@arm.com> References: <1496676177-29356-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <20170612110823.GA27319@leverpostej> <20170612112048.69561e8d067488e8689de755@arm.com> Message-ID: <20170615105735.b89183a9190a261d3b8d132a@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:20:48 -0500 Kim Phillips wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:08:23 +0100 > Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 04:22:52PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > This is the sixth posting of the patches previously posted here: ... > > Kim, do you have any version of the userspace side that we could look > > at? > > > > For review, it would be really helpful to have something that can poke > > the PMU, even if it's incomplete or lacking polish. > > Here's the latest push, based on a a couple of prior versions of this > driver: > > http://linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-kp.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/armspev0.1 > > I don't seem to be able to get any SPE data output after rebasing on > this version of the driver. Still don't know why at the moment... Bisected to commit e38ba76deef "perf tools: force uncore events to system wide monitoring". So, using record with specifying a -C explicitly now produces SPE data, but only a couple of valid records at the beginning of each buffer; the rest is filled with PADding (0's). I see Mark's latest comments have found a possible issue in the perf aux buffer handling code in the driver, and that the driver does some memset of padding (0's) itself; could that be responsible for the above behaviour? Thanks, Kim