From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mem: balanced allocation of hugepages Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:58:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20170621085844.GA93740@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1496756020-4579-1-git-send-email-i.maximets@samsung.com> <1498032250-24924-2-git-send-email-i.maximets@samsung.com> <3630286.1QuNDLyk9u@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ilya Maximets , dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand , Sergio Gonzalez Monroy , Heetae Ahn , Yuanhan Liu , Jianfeng Tan , Neil Horman , Yulong Pei , Jerin Jacob To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04345320 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:58:50 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3630286.1QuNDLyk9u@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 21/06/2017 10:04, Ilya Maximets: > > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES=n > > We can stop inserting LIBRTE in our config options. > CONFIG_RTE_EAL_ is long enough :) > Consistency. While I agree it's unneeded should have it in all or none, and unless we change a bunch of existing ones, I think it means we have it in all.