From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:25:25 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Jens Axboe Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Shaohua Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, lizefan@huawei.com, Kernel-team@fb.com, Shaohua Li Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/12] blktrace: output cgroup info Message-ID: <20170628212525.GB32311@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20170628165316.nozfbdvmpflqwt3f@kernel.org> <15d71514-4f24-0cff-8f85-3e70268fc7a7@kernel.dk> <20170628181159.GB24647@htj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: List-ID: Hello, On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 02:57:38PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > Personally I don't care that much, but the risk of conflicts is much > higher on the block side, than on the kernfs side. So might be the > path of less resistance to pull it through the block tree. And I'd be > happy to do that, if the sign offs on the kernfs side are sufficient. Block tree it is then. Let's wait for Greg to respond. Thanks. -- tejun