On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:59:49PM +0000, Priit Laes wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:45:42PM +0300, Priit Laes wrote: > > > SATA clock on sun4i/sun7i is of type (parent) / M / 6 where > > > 6 is fixed post-divider. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Priit Laes > > > --- > > > drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > > > drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h | 3 ++- > > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c > > > index c0e5c10..de30e15 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c > > > @@ -62,8 +62,13 @@ static unsigned long ccu_div_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > > > parent_rate = ccu_mux_helper_apply_prediv(&cd->common, &cd->mux, -1, > > > parent_rate); > > > > > > - return divider_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate, val, cd->div.table, > > > - cd->div.flags); > > > + val = divider_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate, val, cd->div.table, > > > + cd->div.flags); > > > + > > > + if (cd->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV) > > > + val /= cd->fixed_post_div; > > > + > > > + return val; > > > } > > > > > > static int ccu_div_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > > > @@ -89,6 +94,9 @@ static int ccu_div_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > > > val = divider_get_val(rate, parent_rate, cd->div.table, cd->div.width, > > > cd->div.flags); > > > > > > + if (cd->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV) > > > + val *= cd->fixed_post_div; > > > + > > > spin_lock_irqsave(cd->common.lock, flags); > > > > > > reg = readl(cd->common.base + cd->common.reg); > > > > You also need to adjust the round rate call back to take into account > > the post divider before calling divider_round_rate_parent, and after > > since that function can modify the parent_rate. > > Is there a way to trigger this function? I don't see it getting called. yep, clk_round_rate will call it, and it's also in the code path of clk_set_rate. > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h > > > index 08d0744..f3a5028 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h > > > @@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ struct ccu_div_internal { > > > struct ccu_div { > > > u32 enable; > > > > > > - struct ccu_div_internal div; > > > + struct ccu_div_internal div; > > > > Spurious change? > > Nope, it was not indented the same way as other variables. > Should I send it as separate patch? Hmmm, not really, leave it there. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com