From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:50:20 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jens Axboe , Shaohua Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, lizefan@huawei.com, Kernel-team@fb.com, Shaohua Li Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/12] blktrace: output cgroup info Message-ID: <20170629125020.GA26046@kroah.com> References: <20170628165316.nozfbdvmpflqwt3f@kernel.org> <15d71514-4f24-0cff-8f85-3e70268fc7a7@kernel.dk> <20170628181159.GB24647@htj.duckdns.org> <20170628212525.GB32311@htj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170628212525.GB32311@htj.duckdns.org> List-ID: On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:25:25PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 02:57:38PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Personally I don't care that much, but the risk of conflicts is much > > higher on the block side, than on the kernfs side. So might be the > > path of less resistance to pull it through the block tree. And I'd be > > happy to do that, if the sign offs on the kernfs side are sufficient. > > Block tree it is then. Let's wait for Greg to respond. block tree is fine with me, I'll go ack the kernfs patches now. thanks, greg k-h