From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752777AbdGFCy7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:54:59 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:28236 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751914AbdGFCy5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:54:57 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,315,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="121354631" Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:54:21 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong To: Ming Lei Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Martin K. Petersen" , LKML , James Bottomley , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Linux SCSI List , LKP ML Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [scsi] 5c279bd9e4: blogbench.read_score -10.0% regression Message-ID: <20170706025421.GB5222@yexl-desktop> References: <20170703025722.GG7070@yexl-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Ming Lei On 07/06, Ming Lei wrote: >Hi Xiaolong, > >On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:57 AM, kernel test robot > wrote: >> >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed a -10.0% regression of blogbench.read_score due to commit: > >Looks like related with mq scheduler, could you test the following patch to see >if your issue can be fixed? > >https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=for-linus&id=32825c45ff8f4cce937ab85b030dc693ceb1aa0a > Here is the comparison of commit 5c279bd9e4 and 32825c45, it does help recover performance back. $ compare -at 5c279bd9e40624f4ab6e688671026d6005b066fa 32825c45ff8f4cce937ab85b030dc693ceb1aa0a tests: 1 testcase/path_params/tbox_group/run: blogbench/1SSD-ext4-performance/lkp-bdw-de1 5c279bd9e40624f4 32825c45ff8f4cce937ab85b03 ---------------- -------------------------- %stddev change %stddev \ | \ 262860 36% 358558 blogbench.read_score 9913 ± 4% -33% 6654 blogbench.write_score 86266452 31% 1.129e+08 blogbench.time.file_system_inputs 29.89 22% 36.46 blogbench.time.user_time 214 13% 242 blogbench.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got 620 12% 696 blogbench.time.system_time 1.11e+08 -29% 79019314 blogbench.time.file_system_outputs 439016 -69% 135286 blogbench.time.involuntary_context_switches 0.64 22% 0.78 mpstat.cpu.usr% 7.02 ± 4% -47% 3.72 mpstat.cpu.idle% 237216 1344% 3425183 softirqs.RCU 430504 376% 2048486 softirqs.TIMER 188376 211% 586308 softirqs.SCHED 306478 ± 32% -99% 4150 ± 36% softirqs.NET_RX 86266452 31% 1.129e+08 time.file_system_inputs 29.89 22% 36.46 time.user_time Thanks, Xiaolong > >Thanks, >Ming Lei From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8772355725985779019==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ye Xiaolong To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [scsi] 5c279bd9e4: blogbench.read_score -10.0% regression Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:54:21 +0800 Message-ID: <20170706025421.GB5222@yexl-desktop> In-Reply-To: List-Id: --===============8772355725985779019== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ming Lei On 07/06, Ming Lei wrote: >Hi Xiaolong, > >On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:57 AM, kernel test robot > wrote: >> >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed a -10.0% regression of blogbench.read_score due to commi= t: > >Looks like related with mq scheduler, could you test the following patch t= o see >if your issue can be fixed? > >https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/comm= it/?h=3Dfor-linus&id=3D32825c45ff8f4cce937ab85b030dc693ceb1aa0a > Here is the comparison of commit 5c279bd9e4 and 32825c45, it does help reco= ver performance back. $ compare -at 5c279bd9e40624f4ab6e688671026d6005b066fa 32825c45ff8f4cce937a= b85b030dc693ceb1aa0a tests: 1 testcase/path_params/tbox_group/run: blogbench/1SSD-ext4-performance/lkp-bd= w-de1 5c279bd9e40624f4 32825c45ff8f4cce937ab85b03 = ---------------- -------------------------- = %stddev change %stddev \ | \ = 262860 36% 358558 blogbench.read_score 9913 =C2=B1 4% -33% 6654 blogbench.write_score 86266452 31% 1.129e+08 blogbench.time.file_system_in= puts 29.89 22% 36.46 blogbench.time.user_time 214 13% 242 blogbench.time.percent_of_cpu= _this_job_got 620 12% 696 blogbench.time.system_time 1.11e+08 -29% 79019314 blogbench.time.file_system_ou= tputs 439016 -69% 135286 blogbench.time.involuntary_co= ntext_switches 0.64 22% 0.78 mpstat.cpu.usr% 7.02 =C2=B1 4% -47% 3.72 mpstat.cpu.idle% 237216 1344% 3425183 softirqs.RCU 430504 376% 2048486 softirqs.TIMER 188376 211% 586308 softirqs.SCHED 306478 =C2=B1 32% -99% 4150 =C2=B1 36% softirqs.NET_RX 86266452 31% 1.129e+08 time.file_system_inputs 29.89 22% 36.46 time.user_time Thanks, Xiaolong > >Thanks, >Ming Lei --===============8772355725985779019==--