From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752617AbdGITIV (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2017 15:08:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:34187 "EHLO mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752547AbdGITIU (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2017 15:08:20 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 20:08:14 +0100 From: Okash Khawaja To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Samuel Thibault , Alan Cox , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , William Hubbs , Chris Brannon , Kirk Reiser , speakup@linux-speakup.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] tty: resolve tty contention between kernel and user space Message-ID: <20170709190814.GA913@sanghar> References: <20170708083803.GA23080@kroah.com> <20170709114153.157783481@gmail.com> <20170709114426.618570903@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 06:04:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Above > 1. take mutex > 2. take reference > > Here: > 1. give mutex back > 2. give reference back > > I think we usually see symmetrical calls, i.e. > > 1. give reference back > 2. give mutex back > > So, what did I miss? After we hold the kref, driver won't disappear from underneath us so we don't need tty_mutex just for decrementing the refcount. Thanks, Okash