From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ethdev: introduce lock-free txq capability flag Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:26:15 +0530 Message-ID: <20170710165614.GA30545@jerin> References: <20170421122223.24194-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <20170706062120.3895-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <187460180.BTNh70yjrI@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0087.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.87]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B835699 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:56:35 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <187460180.BTNh70yjrI@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" -----Original Message----- > Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 18:08:57 +0200 > From: Thomas Monjalon > To: Jerin Jacob > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: introduce lock-free txq > capability flag > > Hi Jerin, > Hi Thomas. Thanks for the review. > Thanks for the update. > I think we can add this new flag in 17.08. > I prefer waiting John's review, especially for doc wording, Make sense. I will send the version. > before applying it. I consider it does not hurt to add it post-rc1. > > See below for my first comment on the doc. Fixed in next version.