From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:19:53 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v3 7/9] Test for CVE-2017-5669 in shmat In-Reply-To: <20170623122211.29575-8-rpalethorpe@suse.com> References: <20170623122211.29575-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> <20170623122211.29575-8-rpalethorpe@suse.com> Message-ID: <20170719131953.GI1015@rei.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > +static void cleanup(void) > +{ > + if (shm_addr) > + SAFE_SHMDT(shm_addr); > + shm_addr = 0; > + > + if (shm_id) > + SAFE_SHMCTL(shm_id, IPC_RMID, 0); > + shm_id = 0; > +} > + > +static void run(void) > +{ > + shm_id = SAFE_SHMGET(IPC_PRIVATE, getpagesize(), 0777); Shouldn't be this done once in the test setup()? > + tst_res(TINFO, "Attempting to attach shared memory to null page"); > + shm_addr = shmat(shm_id, ((void *)1), SHM_RND); > + if (shm_addr == (void *)-1) { > + if (errno == EINVAL) { > + tst_res(TPASS, "shmat returned EINVAL"); > + shm_addr = 0; > + return; > + } > + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, > + "The bug was not triggered, but the shmat error is unexpected"); > + } > + > + tst_res(TINFO, "Mapped shared memory to %p", shm_addr); > + > + if (!((size_t)shm_addr & (~0U << 16))) > + tst_res(TFAIL, > + "We have mapped a VM address within the first 64Kb"); > + else > + tst_res(TPASS, > + "The kernel assigned a different VM address"); > + > + ((char *)shm_addr)[0] = 'P'; Why do we try to write to the addres at all? We do PASS/FAIL decision based only on the addres returned from shmat(). Also we should detach the memory here in case that the test was called with -i parameter. > +} > + > +static struct tst_test test = { > + .cleanup = cleanup, > + .test_all = run, > +}; > -- > 2.12.2 > > > -- > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz