All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] binutils: add support for binutils 2.29
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:34:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170729213400.566ef659@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170729181554.GF28707@waldemar-brodkorb.de>

Hello,

On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 20:15:54 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:

> > All patches from binutils 2.28 are kept, except patch
> > 0906-microblaze-pr21180.patch, because it has been merged upstream as
> > of commit bd757ca7bf5886a4025ca02093fca1b8c5ce11a2. Other patches are
> > slightly adapted to differences that appeared in binutils 2.29.
> > 
> > The patches are now all Git formatted, so instead of having weird
> > sequence numbers, they have normal sequence numbers starting from 0001
> > and incrementing.
> > 
> > Since binutils 2.29 is now available as a .tar.xz tarball, we use this
> > format instead of .bz2 used for previous versions.  
> 
> I am testing some more qemu defconfigs with binutils 2.29.
> sh4/sparc worked fine. But xtensa fails to compile busybox:
> 
> /home/wbx/buildroot/output/host/lib/gcc/xtensa-buildroot-linux-uclibc/6.4.0/../../../../xtensa-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld:
> BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.29 assertion fail elf32-xtensa.c:3965
> 
> Adding Max to Cc.

Thanks!

Since we're not switching to 2.29 as the default, I think it's fine if
some architectures have a few issues with 2.29. The whole point of
adding new versions before making them the default is precisely to iron
out such issues.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-29 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-29 13:09 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Update binutils package Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-29 13:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] binutils: bump 2.28.x series to 2.28.1 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-29 13:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] binutils: add support for binutils 2.29 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-29 18:15   ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-07-29 19:34     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-08-02 18:43     ` Max Filippov
2017-07-29 13:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] binutils: switch to use 2.28.x as the default version Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-29 13:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] binutils: remove support for 2.26 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-31 19:27 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Update binutils package Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-31 19:29   ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-08-01 21:38   ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170729213400.566ef659@windsurf.lan \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.