> > I agree this is the least invasive and also the most compatible
> > approach. The other solution would probably be to have some kind of
> > emulation layer?
> 
> Could you detail a bit more what you mean by "emulation layer"?

Not really. That was more a extremly high level approach of what
theoretically could be possible. When I try to think about details, it
gets pretty invasive.

> > Since the spec is not public, details about the protocol will be
> > especially useful, I'd say.
> 
> Okay, I'll see what I can do.

Thanks.