From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751923AbdHCJ1l (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 05:27:41 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:57579 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751258AbdHCJ1k (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 05:27:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 19:27:37 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Darren Hart , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drivers-x86 tree Message-ID: <20170803192737.0951750e@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <1501748223.29303.369.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20170803063743.1d50a5d2@canb.auug.org.au> <1501748223.29303.369.camel@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy, On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 11:17:03 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > I just checked what we have in our for-next branch and mentioned commits > have mine SoB. Should they have something else? In Darren's response it became clear that even though you had initially commited the patches, he had rebased them so he is now the committer. So he should have added a Signed-off-by tag. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell