From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Smart Subject: [PATCH v2 11/20] lpfc: Correct issues with FAWWN and FDISCs Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 17:47:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20170805004731.1335-12-jsmart2021@gmail.com> References: <20170805004731.1335-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:34918 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752595AbdHEAsB (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2017 20:48:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f68.google.com with SMTP id l64so3110138pge.2 for ; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 17:48:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170805004731.1335-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: jsmart2021@gmail.com, Dick Kennedy , James Smart From: Dick Kennedy When using fabric-assigned WWNs, the switch doesn't like copy of the FLOGI payload, which includes valid VVL bits, to be used as the FDISC paylaod. Rather than wait for corrected switch firmware, ensure the VVL bits are marked invalid on FDISCs. Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy Signed-off-by: James Smart --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c index 9a8808abe61f..f97d578ea6bd 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c @@ -8868,6 +8868,7 @@ lpfc_issue_els_fdisc(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp, pcmd += sizeof(uint32_t); /* Node Name */ pcmd += sizeof(uint32_t); /* Node Name */ memcpy(pcmd, &vport->fc_nodename, 8); + sp->cmn.valid_vendor_ver_level = 0; memset(sp->un.vendorVersion, 0, sizeof(sp->un.vendorVersion)); lpfc_set_disctmo(vport); -- 2.13.1