From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Haber Subject: Re: After a while of system running no incoming UDP any more? Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 22:07:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20170811200715.6yxjqwslf2pcu2wn@torres.zugschlus.de> References: <20170724120901.6bpcieyvn5nccm2l@torres.zugschlus.de> <1500905950.2458.6.camel@redhat.com> <20170728062644.bp7agcf6bh7g6yfw@torres.zugschlus.de> <1501229277.2597.1.camel@redhat.com> <20170728121434.vld76q7kohzpmtk2@torres.zugschlus.de> <20170811143453.6vrf2us2jev2ys3d@torres.zugschlus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from torres.zugschlus.de ([85.214.131.164]:51116 "EHLO torres.zugschlus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753343AbdHKUHR (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:07:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170811143453.6vrf2us2jev2ys3d@torres.zugschlus.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:34:53PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:14:34PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > I can confirm that these two changes make a system in bad state work > > again immediately. Will try the patch on 4.12.4 later today. > > After upgrading my test systems to 4.12.5, the issue reappeared. This > shows me that the patch indeed helped (my patched 4.12.4 kernels didn't > show the bad behavior), and that the patch didn't make its way into > 4.12.5. The patch applied to 4.12.5, kernels are building. It seems to be in the freshly released 4.12.6. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421