From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752555AbdHSA3H (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:29:07 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:34107 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752227AbdHSA2u (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:28:50 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,394,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="1164119711" From: Ricardo Neri To: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Brian Gerst , Chris Metcalf , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Liang Z Li , Masami Hiramatsu , Huang Rui , Jiri Slaby , Jonathan Corbet , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paul Gortmaker , Vlastimil Babka , Chen Yucong , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, ricardo.neri@intel.com, Ricardo Neri , Adam Buchbinder , Colin Ian King , Lorenzo Stoakes , Qiaowei Ren , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Adrian Hunter , Kees Cook , Thomas Garnier , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: [PATCH v8 18/28] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 32-bit address encodings Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:27:59 -0700 Message-Id: <20170819002809.111312-19-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.0 In-Reply-To: <20170819002809.111312-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> References: <20170819002809.111312-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 32-bit and 64-bit address encodings are identical. Thus, the same logic could be used to resolve the effective address. However, there are two key differences: address size and enforcement of segment limits. If running a 32-bit process on a 64-bit kernel, it is best to perform the address calculation using 32-bit data types. In this manner hardware is used for the arithmetic, including handling of signs and overflows. 32-bit addresses are generally used in protected mode; segment limits are enforced in this mode. This implementation obtains the limit of the segment associated with the instruction operands and prefixes. If the computed address is outside the segment limits, an error is returned. It is also possible to use 32-bit address in long mode and virtual-8086 mode by using an address override prefix. In such cases, segment limits are not enforced. The new function get_addr_ref_32() is almost identical to the existing function insn_get_addr_ref() (used for 64-bit addresses); except for the differences mentioned above. For the sake of simplicity and readability, it is better to use two separate functions. Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Adam Buchbinder Cc: Colin Ian King Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Qiaowei Ren Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Thomas Garnier Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Ravi V. Shankar Cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri --- arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c index 8ae110a273de..6730c9ba02c5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c @@ -665,6 +665,153 @@ int insn_get_modrm_rm_off(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs) return get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM); } +/** + * get_addr_ref_32() - Obtain a 32-bit linear address + * @insn: Instruction struct with ModRM and SIB bytes and displacement + * @regs: Structure with register values as seen when entering kernel mode + * + * This function is to be used with 32-bit address encodings to obtain the + * linear memory address referred by the instruction's ModRM, SIB, + * displacement bytes and segment base address, as applicable. If in protected + * mode, segment limits are enforced. + * + * Return: linear address referenced by instruction and registers on success. + * -1L on error. + */ +static void __user *get_addr_ref_32(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + int eff_addr, base, indx, addr_offset, base_offset, indx_offset; + unsigned long linear_addr, seg_base_addr, seg_limit, tmp; + insn_byte_t sib; + + insn_get_modrm(insn); + insn_get_sib(insn); + sib = insn->sib.value; + + if (insn->addr_bytes != 4) + goto out_err; + + if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 3) { + addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM); + if (addr_offset < 0) + goto out_err; + + tmp = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset); + /* The 4 most significant bytes must be zero. */ + if (tmp & ~0xffffffffL) + goto out_err; + + eff_addr = (int)(tmp & 0xffffffff); + + seg_base_addr = insn_get_seg_base(regs, insn, addr_offset); + if (seg_base_addr == -1L) + goto out_err; + + seg_limit = get_seg_limit(regs, insn, addr_offset); + } else { + if (insn->sib.nbytes) { + /* + * Negative values in the base and index offset means + * an error when decoding the SIB byte. Except -EDOM, + * which means that the registers should not be used + * in the address computation. + */ + base_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_BASE); + if (base_offset == -EDOM) { + base = 0; + } else if (base_offset < 0) { + goto out_err; + } else { + tmp = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset); + /* The 4 most significant bytes must be zero. */ + if (tmp & ~0xffffffffL) + goto out_err; + + base = (int)(tmp & 0xffffffff); + } + + indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX); + if (indx_offset == -EDOM) { + indx = 0; + } else if (indx_offset < 0) { + goto out_err; + } else { + tmp = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset); + /* The 4 most significant bytes must be zero. */ + if (tmp & ~0xffffffffL) + goto out_err; + + indx = (int)(tmp & 0xffffffff); + } + + eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib)); + + seg_base_addr = insn_get_seg_base(regs, insn, + base_offset); + if (seg_base_addr == -1L) + goto out_err; + + seg_limit = get_seg_limit(regs, insn, base_offset); + } else { + addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM); + + /* + * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. + * In such a case, in 64-bit mode the effective address + * relative to the RIP of the following instruction. + */ + if (addr_offset == -EDOM) { + if (user_64bit_mode(regs)) + eff_addr = (long)regs->ip + insn->length; + else + eff_addr = 0; + } else if (addr_offset < 0) { + goto out_err; + } else { + tmp = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset); + /* The 4 most significant bytes must be zero. */ + if (tmp & ~0xffffffffL) + goto out_err; + + eff_addr = (int)(tmp & 0xffffffff); + } + + seg_base_addr = insn_get_seg_base(regs, insn, + addr_offset); + if (seg_base_addr == -1L) + goto out_err; + + seg_limit = get_seg_limit(regs, insn, addr_offset); + } + eff_addr += insn->displacement.value; + } + + /* + * In protected mode, before computing the linear address, make sure + * the effective address is within the limits of the segment. + * 32-bit addresses can be used in long and virtual-8086 modes if an + * address override prefix is used. In such cases, segment limits are + * not enforced. When in virtual-8086 mode, the segment limit is -1L + * to reflect this situation. + * + * After computed, the effective address is treated as an unsigned + * quantity. + */ + if (!user_64bit_mode(regs) && ((unsigned int)eff_addr > seg_limit)) + goto out_err; + + /* + * Data type long could be 64 bits in size. Ensure that our 32-bit + * effective address is not sign-extended when computing the linear + * address. + */ + linear_addr = (unsigned long)(eff_addr & 0xffffffff) + seg_base_addr; + + return (void __user *)linear_addr; +out_err: + return (void __user *)-1L; +} + /* * return the address being referenced be instruction * for rm=3 returning the content of the rm reg -- 2.13.0