From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] 16.11.3 (LTS) patches review and test
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:40:11 +0800
Message-ID: <20170821034011.GO9612@yliu-home>
References: <20170818104545.GN9612@yliu-home>
 <c9b5eef5-9b7c-2b86-c637-e75a1e386fed@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f53.google.com (mail-pg0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A6C559A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 05:40:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id t3so63620896pgt.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 20:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c9b5eef5-9b7c-2b86-c637-e75a1e386fed@redhat.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 06:29:02PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 11:45 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 16.11.3. Please
> > help review and test. The planned date for the final release is 30th,
> > Aug. Before that, please let me know if anyone has objections with
> > these patches being applied.
> > 
> > These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
> >     http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> >         --yliu
> > 
> 
> Hi Yuanhan,
> 
> I think this one should go in too, as OVS hits this and writes back the
> wrong watermark value to the shared register which can cause problems
> for other ports. I've applied and tested it with DPDK 16.11.
> 
> commit 0e61ab56e01655f02bfe4e6249e032e864b0f5dd
> Author: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Aug 10 18:48:07 2017 +0800
> 
>     net/i40e: fix flow control watermark mismatch
> 
>     Flow control watermark is not read out correctly,
>     that may cause an application who not intend to change
>     watermark but does change it with a rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_set
>     call right after rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get.

Weird, I couldn't find this commit:

    $ git show 0e61ab56e01655f02bfe4e6249e032e864b0f5dd
    fatal: bad object 0e61ab56e01655f02bfe4e6249e032e864b0f5dd

	--yliu