From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] spmi: pmic-arb: Enforce the ownership check optionally Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:55:43 +0800 Message-ID: <20170822085541.GB3685@dragon> References: <1503070110-15018-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55390 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932205AbdHVIzv (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:55:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Kiran Gunda , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Abhijeet Dharmapurikar , David Collins , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:18:58PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 08/18/2017 08:28 AM, Kiran Gunda wrote: > > The peripheral ownership check is not necessary on single master > > platforms. Hence, enforce the peripheral ownership check optionally. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda > > Tested-by: Shawn Guo > > --- > > This sounds like a band-aid. Isn't the gpio driver going to keep probing > all the pins that are not supposed to be accessed due to security > constraints? What exactly is failing in the gpio case? There is a platform_irq_count() call in pinctrl-spmi-gpio probe function. Due to the owner check in spmi-pmic-arb IRQ domain qpnpint_irq_domain_dt_translate() function, the call will return irq number as zero and cause pmic_gpio_probe() fail with -EINVAL error. [ 1.608516] [] qpnpint_irq_domain_dt_translate+0x168/0x194 [ 1.613557] [] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0x17c/0x2d8 [ 1.620672] [] irq_create_of_mapping+0x64/0x74 [ 1.627008] [] of_irq_get+0x54/0x64 [ 1.633169] [] platform_get_irq+0x20/0x150 [ 1.638117] [] platform_irq_count+0x28/0x44 [ 1.643850] [] pmic_gpio_probe+0x50/0x544 Shawn