From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.ru (ozlabs.ru [107.173.13.209]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3xck1B49bHzDrLW for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 20:19:10 +1000 (AEST) From: Alexey Kardashevskiy To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , David Gibson , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Alistair Popple , Russell Currey Subject: [PATCH kernel 2/5] powerpc/eeh: Reduce to one the number of places where edev is allocated Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 20:18:58 +1000 Message-Id: <20170823101901.33961-3-aik@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <20170823101901.33961-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> References: <20170823101901.33961-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c:57 is the only legit place where edev is allocated; other 2 places allocate it on stack and in the heap for a very short period of time to use eeh_pe_get() as takes edev. This changes eeh_pe_get() to receive required parameters explicitly. This removes unnecessary temporary allocation of edev. This uses the "pe_no" name instead of the "pe_config_addr" name as it actually is a PE number and not a config space address as it seemed. Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 3 ++- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++---------- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 15 ++----------- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h index 8e37b71674f4..26a6a43f8799 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h @@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ typedef void *(*eeh_traverse_func)(void *data, void *flag); void eeh_set_pe_aux_size(int size); int eeh_phb_pe_create(struct pci_controller *phb); struct eeh_pe *eeh_phb_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb); -struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct eeh_dev *edev); +struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb, + int pe_no, int config_addr); int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev); int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev); void eeh_pe_update_time_stamp(struct eeh_pe *pe); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c index cc4b206f77e4..84d79f3da7d6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c @@ -230,10 +230,15 @@ void *eeh_pe_dev_traverse(struct eeh_pe *root, * Bus/Device/Function number. The extra data referred by flag * indicates which type of address should be used. */ +struct eeh_pe_get_flag { + int pe_no; + int config_addr; +}; + static void *__eeh_pe_get(void *data, void *flag) { struct eeh_pe *pe = (struct eeh_pe *)data; - struct eeh_dev *edev = (struct eeh_dev *)flag; + struct eeh_pe_get_flag *tmp = (struct eeh_pe_get_flag *) flag; /* Unexpected PHB PE */ if (pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB) @@ -244,17 +249,17 @@ static void *__eeh_pe_get(void *data, void *flag) * have non-zero PE address */ if (eeh_has_flag(EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO)) { - if (edev->pe_config_addr == pe->addr) + if (tmp->pe_no == pe->addr) return pe; } else { - if (edev->pe_config_addr && - (edev->pe_config_addr == pe->addr)) + if (tmp->pe_no && + (tmp->pe_no == pe->addr)) return pe; } /* Try BDF address */ - if (edev->config_addr && - (edev->config_addr == pe->config_addr)) + if (tmp->config_addr && + (tmp->config_addr == pe->config_addr)) return pe; return NULL; @@ -262,7 +267,9 @@ static void *__eeh_pe_get(void *data, void *flag) /** * eeh_pe_get - Search PE based on the given address - * @edev: EEH device + * @phb: PCI controller + * @pe_no: PE number + * @config_addr: Config address * * Search the corresponding PE based on the specified address which * is included in the eeh device. The function is used to check if @@ -271,12 +278,14 @@ static void *__eeh_pe_get(void *data, void *flag) * which is composed of PCI bus/device/function number, or unified * PE address. */ -struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct eeh_dev *edev) +struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb, + int pe_no, int config_addr) { - struct eeh_pe *root = eeh_phb_pe_get(edev->phb); + struct eeh_pe *root = eeh_phb_pe_get(phb); + struct eeh_pe_get_flag tmp = { pe_no, config_addr }; struct eeh_pe *pe; - pe = eeh_pe_traverse(root, __eeh_pe_get, edev); + pe = eeh_pe_traverse(root, __eeh_pe_get, &tmp); return pe; } @@ -344,7 +353,8 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev) * PE should be composed of PCI bus and its subordinate * components. */ - pe = eeh_pe_get(edev); + pe = eeh_pe_get(edev->pdn->phb, edev->pe_config_addr, + edev->config_addr); if (pe && !(pe->type & EEH_PE_INVALID)) { /* Mark the PE as type of PCI bus */ pe->type = EEH_PE_BUS; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c index 3f48f6df1cf3..ac8c01cd251c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c @@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ static ssize_t pnv_eeh_ei_write(struct file *filp, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) { struct pci_controller *hose = filp->private_data; - struct eeh_dev *edev; struct eeh_pe *pe; int pe_no, type, func; unsigned long addr, mask; @@ -135,13 +134,7 @@ static ssize_t pnv_eeh_ei_write(struct file *filp, return -EINVAL; /* Retrieve PE */ - edev = kzalloc(sizeof(*edev), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!edev) - return -ENOMEM; - edev->phb = hose; - edev->pe_config_addr = pe_no; - pe = eeh_pe_get(edev); - kfree(edev); + pe = eeh_pe_get(hose, pe_no, 0); if (!pe) return -ENODEV; @@ -1381,7 +1374,6 @@ static int pnv_eeh_get_pe(struct pci_controller *hose, struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data; struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_pe; struct eeh_pe *dev_pe; - struct eeh_dev edev; /* * If PHB supports compound PE, to fetch @@ -1397,10 +1389,7 @@ static int pnv_eeh_get_pe(struct pci_controller *hose, } /* Find the PE according to PE# */ - memset(&edev, 0, sizeof(struct eeh_dev)); - edev.phb = hose; - edev.pe_config_addr = pe_no; - dev_pe = eeh_pe_get(&edev); + dev_pe = eeh_pe_get(hose, pe_no, 0); if (!dev_pe) return -EEXIST; -- 2.11.0