All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
	Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
Subject: [PATCH kernel 5/5] powerpc/eeh: Remove unnecessary node from pci_dn
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 20:19:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170823101901.33961-6-aik@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170823101901.33961-1-aik@ozlabs.ru>

The pci_dn struct caches a OF device node pointer in order to access
the "ibm,loc-code" property when EEH is recovering.

However, when this happens in eeh_dev_check_failure(), we also have
a pci_dev pointer which should have a valid pointer to the device node
when pci_dn has one (both pointers are not NULL for physical functions
and are NULL for virtual functions).

This removes the node pointer from the pci_dn struct and used pdev
in eeh_dev_check_failure() instead.

This changes pci_remove_device_node_info() to look for a parent of
the node being removed, just like pci_add_device_node_info() does when it
references the parent node.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 1 -
 arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c             | 9 +++++----
 arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c          | 8 +++++---
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
index 56c67d3f0108..0b8aa1fe2d5f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
@@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ struct pci_dn {
 	struct  pci_dn *parent;
 	struct  pci_controller *phb;	/* for pci devices */
 	struct	iommu_table_group *table_group;	/* for phb's or bridges */
-	struct	device_node *node;	/* back-pointer to the device_node */
 
 	int	pci_ext_config_space;	/* for pci devices */
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index c877014d11ce..2c926029adbe 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 	int ret;
 	int active_flags = (EEH_STATE_MMIO_ACTIVE | EEH_STATE_DMA_ACTIVE);
 	unsigned long flags;
-	struct pci_dn *pdn;
+	struct device_node *dn;
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
 	struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent_pe, *phb_pe;
 	int rc = 0;
@@ -493,9 +493,10 @@ int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 	if (pe->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED) {
 		pe->check_count++;
 		if (pe->check_count % EEH_MAX_FAILS == 0) {
-			pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
-			if (pdn->node)
-				location = of_get_property(pdn->node, "ibm,loc-code", NULL);
+			dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
+			if (dn)
+				location = of_get_property(dn, "ibm,loc-code",
+						NULL);
 			printk(KERN_ERR "EEH: %d reads ignored for recovering device at "
 				"location=%s driver=%s pci addr=%s\n",
 				pe->check_count,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
index 0256372b72de..0e395afbf0f4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
@@ -293,7 +293,6 @@ struct pci_dn *pci_add_device_node_info(struct pci_controller *hose,
 	if (pdn == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 	dn->data = pdn;
-	pdn->node = dn;
 	pdn->phb = hose;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
 	pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE;
@@ -342,6 +341,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_add_device_node_info);
 void pci_remove_device_node_info(struct device_node *dn)
 {
 	struct pci_dn *pdn = dn ? PCI_DN(dn) : NULL;
+	struct device_node *parent;
 #ifdef CONFIG_EEH
 	struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
 
@@ -354,8 +354,10 @@ void pci_remove_device_node_info(struct device_node *dn)
 
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pdn->child_list));
 	list_del(&pdn->list);
-	if (pdn->parent)
-		of_node_put(pdn->parent->node);
+
+	parent = of_get_parent(dn);
+	if (parent)
+		of_node_put(parent);
 
 	dn->data = NULL;
 	kfree(pdn);
-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23 10:18 [PATCH kernel 0/5] powerpc/eeh: Some cleanups Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-08-23 10:18 ` [PATCH kernel 1/5] powerpc/pci: Remove unused parameter from add_one_dev_pci_data() Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-08-23 10:18 ` [PATCH kernel 2/5] powerpc/eeh: Reduce to one the number of places where edev is allocated Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-08-23 10:18 ` [PATCH kernel 3/5] powerpc/eeh: Remove unnecessary pointer to phb from eeh_dev Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-08-24  4:45   ` Andrew Donnellan
2017-08-28  6:25   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-23 10:19 ` [PATCH kernel 4/5] powerpc/eeh: Remove unnecessary config_addr " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-08-28  6:27   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-23 10:19 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2017-08-28  6:27   ` [PATCH kernel 5/5] powerpc/eeh: Remove unnecessary node from pci_dn Michael Ellerman
2017-08-24  1:13 ` [PATCH kernel 0/5] powerpc/eeh: Some cleanups Russell Currey
2017-08-24  2:19   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-08-24  5:29     ` Andrew Donnellan
     [not found] ` <20170823102823.7F12CC603E@b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com>
2017-08-24  4:21   ` [PATCH kernel 1/5] powerpc/pci: Remove unused parameter from add_one_dev_pci_data() Andrew Donnellan
     [not found] ` <20170823101926.03970124035@b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com>
2017-08-24  4:34   ` [PATCH kernel 2/5] powerpc/eeh: Reduce to one the number of places where edev is allocated Andrew Donnellan
     [not found] ` <20170823102546.29A77AE034@b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com>
2017-08-24  4:55   ` [PATCH kernel 4/5] powerpc/eeh: Remove unnecessary config_addr from eeh_dev Andrew Donnellan
     [not found] ` <20170823102629.539BD2803A@b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com>
2017-08-24  5:19   ` [PATCH kernel 5/5] powerpc/eeh: Remove unnecessary node from pci_dn Andrew Donnellan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170823101901.33961-6-aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.