From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl7Q9-0008H8-Ds for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 01:44:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl7Q4-0007Pj-I2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 01:44:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl7Q4-0007PJ-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 01:44:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:44:28 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20170825054428.GG14174@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1503471071-2233-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <1503471071-2233-6-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <20170823174629.GH2648@work-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170823174629.GH2648@work-vm> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 5/8] hmp: support "without_bql" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , "Daniel P . Berrange" , Fam Zheng , Juan Quintela , mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Eric Blake , Laurent Vivier , Markus Armbruster On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 06:46:29PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Peter Xu (peterx@redhat.com) wrote: > > Introducing new option "without_bql" for HMP commands. It works just > > like QMP "without-bql", but for HMP commands. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu > > It's going to be interesting when we have hmp commands that just call > their qmp equivalent that we need to check for no mistakes. But we don't have any QMP & HMP mapping between them, do we? Then I have no good idea on how we can do the check. -- Peter Xu