From: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
tkjos@google.com, arve@android.com, amit.pundir@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
maco@google.com, malchev@google.com, ccross@android.com,
Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/13] ANDROID: binder: improve priority inheritance.
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:33:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825093335.100892-6-maco@android.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170825093335.100892-1-maco@android.com>
By raising the priority of a thread selected for
a transaction *before* we wake it up.
Delay restoring the priority when doing a reply
until after we wake-up the process receiving
the reply.
Signed-off-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
---
drivers/android/binder.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index 247e913a6e6a..76d7544120a2 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ enum {
* @is_dead: thread is dead and awaiting free
* when outstanding transactions are cleaned up
* (protected by @proc->inner_lock)
+ * @task: struct task_struct for this thread
*
* Bookkeeping structure for binder threads.
*/
@@ -628,6 +629,7 @@ struct binder_thread {
struct binder_stats stats;
atomic_t tmp_ref;
bool is_dead;
+ struct task_struct *task;
};
struct binder_transaction {
@@ -646,6 +648,7 @@ struct binder_transaction {
unsigned int flags;
struct binder_priority priority;
struct binder_priority saved_priority;
+ bool set_priority_called;
kuid_t sender_euid;
/**
* @lock: protects @from, @to_proc, and @to_thread
@@ -1160,6 +1163,38 @@ static void binder_set_priority(struct task_struct *task,
set_user_nice(task, priority);
}
+static void binder_transaction_priority(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct binder_transaction *t,
+ struct binder_priority node_prio)
+{
+ struct binder_priority desired_prio;
+
+ if (t->set_priority_called)
+ return;
+
+ t->set_priority_called = true;
+ t->saved_priority.sched_policy = task->policy;
+ t->saved_priority.prio = task->normal_prio;
+
+ desired_prio.prio = t->priority.prio;
+ desired_prio.sched_policy = t->priority.sched_policy;
+
+ if (node_prio.prio < t->priority.prio ||
+ (node_prio.prio == t->priority.prio &&
+ node_prio.sched_policy == SCHED_FIFO)) {
+ /*
+ * In case the minimum priority on the node is
+ * higher (lower value), use that priority. If
+ * the priority is the same, but the node uses
+ * SCHED_FIFO, prefer SCHED_FIFO, since it can
+ * run unbounded, unlike SCHED_RR.
+ */
+ desired_prio = node_prio;
+ }
+
+ binder_set_priority(task, desired_prio);
+}
+
static struct binder_node *binder_get_node_ilocked(struct binder_proc *proc,
binder_uintptr_t ptr)
{
@@ -2633,11 +2668,15 @@ static bool binder_proc_transaction(struct binder_transaction *t,
{
struct list_head *target_list = NULL;
struct binder_node *node = t->buffer->target_node;
+ struct binder_priority node_prio;
bool oneway = !!(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY);
bool wakeup = true;
BUG_ON(!node);
binder_node_lock(node);
+ node_prio.prio = node->min_priority;
+ node_prio.sched_policy = node->sched_policy;
+
if (oneway) {
BUG_ON(thread);
if (node->has_async_transaction) {
@@ -2659,12 +2698,14 @@ static bool binder_proc_transaction(struct binder_transaction *t,
if (!thread && !target_list)
thread = binder_select_thread_ilocked(proc);
- if (thread)
+ if (thread) {
target_list = &thread->todo;
- else if (!target_list)
+ binder_transaction_priority(thread->task, t, node_prio);
+ } else if (!target_list) {
target_list = &proc->todo;
- else
+ } else {
BUG_ON(target_list != &node->async_todo);
+ }
binder_enqueue_work_ilocked(&t->work, target_list);
@@ -2741,7 +2782,6 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc,
}
thread->transaction_stack = in_reply_to->to_parent;
binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
- binder_set_priority(current, in_reply_to->saved_priority);
target_thread = binder_get_txn_from_and_acq_inner(in_reply_to);
if (target_thread == NULL) {
return_error = BR_DEAD_REPLY;
@@ -3151,6 +3191,7 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc,
binder_enqueue_work_ilocked(&t->work, &target_thread->todo);
binder_inner_proc_unlock(target_proc);
wake_up_interruptible_sync(&target_thread->wait);
+ binder_set_priority(current, in_reply_to->saved_priority);
binder_free_transaction(in_reply_to);
} else if (!(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY)) {
BUG_ON(t->buffer->async_transaction != 0);
@@ -3239,6 +3280,7 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc,
BUG_ON(thread->return_error.cmd != BR_OK);
if (in_reply_to) {
+ binder_set_priority(current, in_reply_to->saved_priority);
thread->return_error.cmd = BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE;
binder_enqueue_work(thread->proc,
&thread->return_error.work,
@@ -4050,26 +4092,13 @@ static int binder_thread_read(struct binder_proc *proc,
BUG_ON(t->buffer == NULL);
if (t->buffer->target_node) {
struct binder_node *target_node = t->buffer->target_node;
- struct binder_priority prio = t->priority;
+ struct binder_priority node_prio;
tr.target.ptr = target_node->ptr;
tr.cookie = target_node->cookie;
- t->saved_priority.sched_policy = current->policy;
- t->saved_priority.prio = current->normal_prio;
- if (target_node->min_priority < t->priority.prio ||
- (target_node->min_priority == t->priority.prio &&
- target_node->sched_policy == SCHED_FIFO)) {
- /*
- * In case the minimum priority on the node is
- * higher (lower value), use that priority. If
- * the priority is the same, but the node uses
- * SCHED_FIFO, prefer SCHED_FIFO, since it can
- * run unbounded, unlike SCHED_RR.
- */
- prio.sched_policy = target_node->sched_policy;
- prio.prio = target_node->min_priority;
- }
- binder_set_priority(current, prio);
+ node_prio.sched_policy = target_node->sched_policy;
+ node_prio.prio = target_node->min_priority;
+ binder_transaction_priority(current, t, node_prio);
cmd = BR_TRANSACTION;
} else {
tr.target.ptr = 0;
@@ -4245,6 +4274,8 @@ static struct binder_thread *binder_get_thread_ilocked(
binder_stats_created(BINDER_STAT_THREAD);
thread->proc = proc;
thread->pid = current->pid;
+ get_task_struct(current);
+ thread->task = current;
atomic_set(&thread->tmp_ref, 0);
init_waitqueue_head(&thread->wait);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->todo);
@@ -4295,6 +4326,7 @@ static void binder_free_thread(struct binder_thread *thread)
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&thread->todo));
binder_stats_deleted(BINDER_STAT_THREAD);
binder_proc_dec_tmpref(thread->proc);
+ put_task_struct(thread->task);
kfree(thread);
}
--
2.14.1.480.gb18f417b89-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-25 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-25 9:33 [PATCH 00/13] ANDROID: binder: RT priority inheritance and small fixes Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 01/13] ANDROID: binder: remove proc waitqueue Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 02/13] ANDROID: binder: push new transactions to waiting threads Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 03/13] ANDROID: binder: add support for RT prio inheritance Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 15:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-25 18:47 ` Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 04/13] ANDROID: binder: add min sched_policy to node Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` Martijn Coenen [this message]
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 06/13] ANDROID: binder: add RT inheritance flag " Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 07/13] Add BINDER_GET_NODE_DEBUG_INFO ioctl Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 08/13] ANDROID: binder: don't check prio permissions on restore Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 09/13] ANDROID: binder: Don't BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked()) Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 10/13] ANDROID: binder: call poll_wait() unconditionally Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 11/13] ANDROID: binder: don't enqueue death notifications to thread todo Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 12/13] ANDROID: binder: don't queue async transactions to thread Martijn Coenen
2017-08-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 13/13] ANDROID: binder: Add tracing for binder priority inheritance Martijn Coenen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170825093335.100892-6-maco@android.com \
--to=maco@android.com \
--cc=amit.pundir@linaro.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@google.com \
--cc=malchev@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.