From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlFDd-0005fh-Qg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:04:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlFDZ-0003ou-S8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:04:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlFDZ-0003oc-MM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:04:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:04:08 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170825160408.2775c8b5.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3ed8b810b6592daee6a775037ce21f850e40647d.1503667215.git.alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <3ed8b810b6592daee6a775037ce21f850e40647d.1503667215.git.alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390-ccw: Fix alignment for CCW1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Farhan Ali Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:24:46 -0400 Farhan Ali wrote: > The commit 198c0d1f9df8c4 s390x/css: check ccw address validity > exposes an alignment issue in ccw bios. > > According to PoP the CCW must be doubleword aligned. Let's fix > this in the bios. > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali > Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic > Reviewed-by: Eric Farman > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger > --- > pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h > index f5b4549..55eaeee 100644 > --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h > +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct ccw1 { > __u8 flags; > __u16 count; > __u32 cda; > -} __attribute__ ((packed)); > +} __attribute__ ((packed, aligned(8))); > > #define CCW_FLAG_DC 0x80 > #define CCW_FLAG_CC 0x40 Currently testing. This looks obviously right, but did you figure out what the (probably unrelated) other failure was?