From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com (mail-lf0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC086067D for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 08:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d17so10583471lfe.1 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 01:20:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chargestorm-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:organization :user-agent; bh=opVhA3ibMxV8aJ2i9BOa4V0Cca3d9sdkDOaNYGKhews=; b=HfReICmXryZ1hgmDQW7rYqTKVHbSAOyiF/RZD6lQNmZyDyseQQBP868c+vVUQx5UTK aa/fJ4fRnmaGJzwk8lrAhlxNNvlHFr7+dJA70LuychjkM1fpGdM/w31U4vyQC9p5lupf tnU/au1khLH+bYbK+TPwNwF2Nimo2MSfOsWwkJcqvVEbBEd2+N49nwYmAMc96/dyvcCc f0Zj5bLebrnKm365gn1BiNHghOdJablxWpvmUA1G8OmDaldU1amPrEd3SU421s/ZYywh oMrMr7sYyoi472w1tXldnsHDvlJouGPouhNNiuz2hDUwuLr/b5tH77VMaMwByf/I7Thv p+HA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:organization:user-agent; bh=opVhA3ibMxV8aJ2i9BOa4V0Cca3d9sdkDOaNYGKhews=; b=KooMsIeZ5DOq8ChNdO28Mv/l90eS4e/8b/Jl/8x8PrCNyMuwLcMM65D7Hs6dDNt1xk t4txtwrqV4yexyObZMsz6i23KykdRIIYYnOWkEgCW/TK4xwSpnwqbXmbRIeWtNYJAjJL jZ53iFqXMegA9S5z0IrwUln5FgQ37i9xaE3zd/+zOWprSzCvAThGVRVZIKqrt9W0tR4t Y92cq/wR2U8+11+wolxYMHmRIhlPSExRoFDi8Ru7l35BkU2aFcgIWaoWzOj8yrEQrfCp ZdsUMpyub7GfSt9dRxiiThnFQbkz4IWZfumgwO0FWRhX5cKbN/95T4yN8/cv9FfRyZOz M/Fg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hJWgicZHtb13R2fT+L/37fO60W7F/WHw/YMJhvhlZlG2hZ2PUj TqGNnHL8QZlHon8c X-Received: by 10.46.8.26 with SMTP id 26mr1487662lji.27.1503994818216; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 01:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ad.chargestorm.se (194-237-220-218.customer.telia.com. [194.237.220.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e82sm494254lji.83.2017.08.29.01.20.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Aug 2017 01:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:20:14 +0200 From: Anders Darander To: Yeoh Ee Peng Message-ID: <20170829082014.ncc3tkyjrlurnkbm@ad.chargestorm.se> Mail-Followup-To: Yeoh Ee Peng , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1503946921-111882-1-git-send-email-ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1503946921-111882-1-git-send-email-ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com> X-Accept-Language: sv, en, de X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5AF0 B2E9 78FE 9D75 D110 6F8F 3E31 84D7 920E 938C X-GPG-Key-Id: 0x920E938C X-GPG-Keyserver: hkp://keys.gnupg.net Organization: ChargeStorm AB User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] insane: add qa check for uppercase recipe name X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 08:20:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, * Yeoh Ee Peng [170829 04:11]: > Since we disabled uppercase characters in overrides a few releases > ago, uppercase characters in recipe names (and for that matter, distro > and machine names) cannot be supported due to their reliance upon > overrides including the name. > QA check will produce an warning message when it verify that recipe > name is uppercase. > [YOCTO# 11592] Could you add QA checks also for uppercase in machine and distro names? When giving an on-site training last winter (using Morty), I helped the customer solve quite a few issues stemming from the fact that they had a machine name with uppercase letters in. I know that the bug in question specifically talks about recipe name, though adding checks for them all would be even better, IMHO. Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander, Senior System Architect ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB